"Accusers" Example Sentences
1. The accusers presented strong evidence in court.
2. The accused asked to face his accusers directly.
3. The accusers' testimonies were conflicting and confusing.
4. The defense lawyer tried to discredit the accusers.
5. The jury had to decide between the word of the accused and the accusers.
6. The accusers claimed they saw the accused at the crime scene.
7. The police questioned several potential accusers before narrowing down their list.
8. The accusers appeared nervous and shaky on the witness stand.
9. The accused vehemently denied the accusations made by his accusers.
10. The accusers refused to back down from their claims.
11. The accused realized he needed to come up with a strong defense against his accusers.
12. The accusers were called to testify again due to discrepancies in their earlier statements.
13. The judge allowed the accused to cross-examine his accusers.
14. The accusers' stories were consistent with one another.
15. The accused's lawyer brought up the possibility of false accusations by the accusers.
16. The accusers' identities were kept anonymous for their safety.
17. The accused's alibi contradicted the testimonies of the accusers.
18. The accusers provided alibis for themselves, proving their innocence.
19. The accused was found guilty despite the lack of physical evidence, solely based on the word of the accusers.
20. The accusers demanded justice for the harm caused to them.
21. The accused had a history of violent behavior, giving credibility to the accusers' claims.
22. The accusers were reluctant to come forward for fear of retribution.
23. The accused tried to intimidate his accusers during the trial's proceedings.
24. The accusers held their ground despite the accused's attempts to sway them.
25. The accused made personal attacks against the accusers to discredit them.
26. The accusers proved to be strong and resilient in the face of adversity.
27. The accused's defense team tried to shift the blame onto the accusers.
28. The accusers were praised for their bravery in standing up against injustice.
29. The accused could not provide a plausible explanation for his actions, against the accusations of his accusers.
30. The accusers gained closure and a sense of justice through the verdict of the trial.
Common Phases
1. The
accusers claimed that the defendant was guilty of the crime;
2. The
accusers' allegations were based on circumstantial evidence;
3. The
accusers argued that the defendant had motive to commit the crime;
4. The
accusers cast doubt on the defendant's alibi;
5. The
accusers insisted that the defendant had the means to carry out the crime;
6. The
accusers painted a vivid picture of the defendant's criminal intent;
7. The
accusers presented a convincing case against the defendant;
8. The
accusers stood firm in their belief that the defendant was responsible for the crime;
9. The
accusers sought to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.