Averments example sentences

"Averments" Example Sentences

1. The prosecution's averments were not consistent with the evidence presented.
2. She made several averments to prove her innocence.
3. The defendant's averments were seen as implausible by the jury.
4. The judge asked for clarifications on the averments made by the defense.
5. The plaintiff's averments seemed to be exaggerated.
6. The lack of averments in the witness testimony caused doubts about the case.
7. The defendant's lawyer challenged the validity of the prosecution's averments.
8. The judge dismissed the case due to insufficient averments.
9. She refused to sign the document with the false averments.
10. The police report contained some false averments.
11. The averments made by the defense contradicted previous statements.
12. The plaintiff's averments were supported by concrete evidence.
13. The defense lawyer made some incriminating averments about the victim.
14. The judge ordered the defense to refrain from making unsubstantiated averments.
15. The prosecution's averments were proven wrong by a key witness.
16. The defendant's averments were seen as excuses for the crime committed.
17. The judge asked for further evidence to support the plaintiff's averments.
18. The defense made some shocking averments during the trial.
19. The prosecution's averments were based purely on speculation.
20. The defendant's averments lacked credibility in the eyes of the jury.
21. The judge reminded both parties to limit their averments to what could be proven.
22. The plaintiff's averments were disputed by eyewitness accounts.
23. The defense made some damaging averments about the prosecution's case.
24. The judge asked for specific dates and times to support the averments made.
25. The prosecution's averments were supported by DNA evidence.
26. The defense lawyer made some emotional averments during the closing arguments.
27. The judge made a ruling based on the strength of the averments made by each party.
28. The plaintiff's averments were found to be inconsistent with the medical records.
29. The defense made some contradictory averments during cross-examination.
30. The prosecution's averments were seen as prejudicial by the defense.

Common Phases

1. The plaintiff made several averments in their complaint; stating the defendant breached the contract, caused damages, and acted with negligence.
2. The averments made by the witness were crucial to the case; their testimony provided evidence of the defendant's guilt.
3. The defendant's averments in their counterclaim were baseless; they provided no evidence to support their accusations.
4. The judge accepted the averments made by the prosecution; ruling that there was sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.
5. The defendant's averments that they were not present at the scene of the crime were contradicted by several eyewitnesses; weakening their defense.
6. The plaintiff's averments that they were wrongfully terminated were supported by documentation; providing credibility to their claim.
7. The defense team's averments that the evidence was circumstantial were dismissed by the judge; ruling that there was enough proof to support the prosecution's case.
8. The averments made by the expert witness were crucial to understanding the technical aspects of the case; clarifying complex concepts for the jury.
9. The defendant's averments that they had no knowledge of the illegal activity were challenged by the prosecution; presenting evidence to the contrary.
10. The plaintiff's averments that the product caused harm were supported by medical records; providing evidence of the product's dangerous nature.