Certaintyinsentencing example sentences

"Certaintyinsentencing" Example Sentences

1. The court delivered certainty in sentencing for the defendant's crimes.
2. The judge emphasized the importance of certainty in sentencing for deterrence.
3. Certainty in sentencing is a key component of a fair justice system.
4. The victim's family was relieved that the court provided certainty in sentencing.
5. The prosecutor argued that certainty in sentencing would send a strong message to other offenders.
6. The defense attorney questioned the certainty in sentencing and requested a lower sentence.
7. The jury took into account the need for certainty in sentencing when deliberating the verdict.
8. The judge announced the verdict and provided certainty in sentencing for the defendant.
9. The defendant expressed remorse and accepted the certainty in sentencing.
10. Certainty in sentencing is important for maintaining public trust in the justice system.
11. The court considered the principles of certainty in sentencing when deciding on the appropriate sentence.
12. The judge explained the reasons for providing certainty in sentencing for the defendant's actions.
13. The legal community debates the merits of certainty in sentencing versus judicial discretion.
14. The sentencing guidelines provide a framework for certainty in sentencing for criminal offenses.
15. The victim impact statement highlighted the need for certainty in sentencing for the defendant.
16. The defendant's prior criminal history influenced the court's decision on certainty in sentencing.
17. The court recognized the importance of certainty in sentencing for victims of crime and their families.
18. The sentencing hearing allowed for the defendant to argue against the certainty in sentencing.
19. The prosecution called for maximum certainty in sentencing for the defendant's violent crimes.
20. The judge's decision on certainty in sentencing had a ripple effect in the legal community.
21. The sentencing hearing provided an opportunity to address concerns about certainty in sentencing.
22. The defendant's plea deal included a provision for certainty in sentencing.
23. The defense argued that certainty in sentencing could result in harsh and disproportionate punishment.
24. The sentencing phase of a trial is where the judge determines the level of certainty in sentencing.
25. The parole board takes into account the principle of certainty in sentencing when reviewing an inmate's case.
26. The defense called for discretion over certainty in sentencing, citing mitigating circumstances.
27. The judge considered the defendant's remorse and rehabilitation efforts in determining certainty in sentencing.
28. The victim impact statement emphasized the need for certainty in sentencing to provide closure to the victim and their family.
29. The defendant's actions caused harm to many individuals, leading the judge to prioritize certainty in sentencing.
30. The Supreme Court ruled on a case involving the principle of certainty in sentencing.
31. The defendant's attorney challenged the certainty in sentencing, citing ambiguity in the law.
32. Certainty in sentencing helps to reduce bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system.
33. The prosecutor argued that certainty in sentencing was necessary to hold the defendant accountable for their actions.
34. The judge's decision on certainty in sentencing was criticized by some as being too lenient.
35. The victim's family appreciated the court's commitment to certainty in sentencing, despite the emotional toll of the trial.
36. The sentencing hearing included testimony from witnesses to help determine the appropriate level of certainty in sentencing.
37. The defense called for flexibility over certainty in sentencing, arguing that each case is unique.
38. The court issued a statement on the importance of certainty in sentencing for public safety and deterrence.
39. The defendant's circumstances were taken into account when determining the appropriate level of certainty in sentencing.
40. Certainty in sentencing is one way to ensure that punishments are proportionate to the crimes committed.

Common Phases

1. "Certainty in sentencing is crucial for maintaining public trust in the justice system;"
2. "The lack of certainty in sentencing can lead to inconsistencies and unfairness in the judicial process;"
3. "Judges must ensure that they are consistent in their sentencing decisions to promote certainty and fairness;"
4. "Mandatory minimum sentences can provide a level of certainty in sentencing, but they may also lead to unjust outcomes;"
5. "Certainty in sentencing helps to deter future crime and promotes respect for the law."