Coherentists example sentences

"Coherentists" Example Sentences

1. Coherentists believe that truth is not found in individual beliefs, but rather in the coherence of a set of beliefs.
2. The coherentists reject the view that beliefs can be individually justified and instead emphasize the interconnectedness of beliefs.
3. According to coherentists, justification is a matter of coherence rather than appeal to external evidence or foundational beliefs.
4. Coherentists argue that beliefs cannot be evaluated in isolation, but rather must be considered within the context of a larger system of beliefs.
5. Unlike foundationalists, coherentists believe that there is no set of beliefs that can serve as the unshakeable foundation for all other beliefs.
6. Coherentists contend that beliefs are not justified by appeal to external evidence but rather by their role in a larger web of beliefs.
7. The coherentists maintain that beliefs are justified if they fit well with our overall system of beliefs and if they help to explain other beliefs.
8. Coherentists argue that a belief can be retained even if it is not supported by direct evidence, as long as it fits coherently within the larger system of beliefs.
9. Some critics of the coherentists argue that their view leads to circularity or infinite regress.
10. Coherentists reject the idea that beliefs must be independently justified and instead emphasize the role of holistic reasoning in determining the justification of beliefs.
11. According to coherentists, justification involves examining the overall coherence and consistency of our beliefs, rather than appealing to some external standard of evidence or truth.
12. Critics of the coherentists argue that their view fails to account for the ways in which our beliefs are influenced by factors such as emotions, biases, and social pressures.
13. Coherentists argue that even seemingly basic or foundational beliefs must be evaluated in relation to our larger system of beliefs, rather than being taken as self-evident or indubitable.
14. The coherentists maintain that the justification of a belief is not determined solely by its relationship to external evidence, but rather by its coherence with other beliefs in the system.
15. According to coherentists, justification is ultimately a matter of coherence and consistency within a larger network of beliefs.
16. Coherentists reject the idea that there is some external, objective truth that can serve as a foundation for all other beliefs.
17. Some proponents of coherentism argue that it is a more realistic and less idealized approach to epistemic justification than foundationalism.
18. The coherentists contend that the strength of our beliefs should be evaluated not simply on the basis of external evidence, but also on their coherence with other beliefs in the system.
19. Coherentists emphasize the role of reasoning and argumentation in evaluating our beliefs, rather than simply accepting them as given.
20. Coherentists maintain that even seemingly certain beliefs can be questioned and evaluated within the context of a larger system of beliefs.
21. Critics of coherentism argue that it fails to provide a clear criterion for determining when a set of beliefs is sufficiently coherent or consistent to be considered justified.
22. Coherentists acknowledge that the coherence of a set of beliefs is not a guarantee of its truth, but argue that it is the best we can do in terms of epistemic justification.
23. According to the coherentists, there is no privileged group of beliefs that can provide an unshakable foundation for all other beliefs.
24. Coherentists stress the importance of maintaining an open mind and being willing to revise our beliefs in response to new evidence or arguments.
25. Critics of coherentism argue that it fails to account for the ways in which our beliefs can be shaped by our experiences and intuitions.
26. Coherentists contend that the justification of a belief is based on its role in helping to explain and support other beliefs in a larger system.
27. According to the coherentists, the coherence and consistency of our beliefs should be the primary criterion for determining their justification.
28. Coherentists emphasize the importance of considering alternative viewpoints and evaluating our beliefs in light of counterarguments and objections.
29. Critics of coherentism argue that it undermines the possibility of objective truth and reduces all beliefs to matters of subjective preference or consensus.
30. Coherentists acknowledge that their approach is not without its challenges and difficulties, but argue that it provides a more realistic and nuanced view of epistemic justification than foundationalism.

Common Phases

not assume a position without evidence; knowledge arises through mutual support of beliefs; truth is found through the coherence of beliefs; there are no foundational beliefs; beliefs are justified by their relations to other beliefs.