Objectors example sentences

"Objectors" Example Sentences

1. The objectors strongly opposed the government's decision.
2. The objectors were met with hostility from the supporters of the plan.
3. The objectors argued that the proposal would have serious consequences.
4. The objectors made their concerns clear to the council members.
5. The objectors shouted their dissent during the meeting.
6. The objectors presented a petition to the mayor to stop the project.
7. The objectors filed a lawsuit against the company for environmental damage.
8. The objectors accused the developers of ignoring community feedback.
9. The objectors rallied outside City Hall to protest the policy.
10. The objectors demanded a hearing to voice their objections.
11. The objectors held up signs that read "Stop the Destruction!"
12. The objectors called for a boycott of the business in question.
13. The objectors stormed out of the room in frustration.
14. The objectors felt that their voices were not being heard.
15. The objectors submitted evidence to support their claims.
16. The objectors were concerned about the impact on local wildlife.
17. The objectors cited safety concerns as a reason to halt the project.
18. The objectors urged the government to reconsider their stance.
19. The objectors expressed dismay at the lack of transparency from officials.
20. The objectors were vilified by those who supported the policy.
21. The objectors argued that the development would cause irreparable harm.
22. The objectors staged a sit-in to raise awareness of their cause.
23. The objectors urged citizens to vote against the proposed law.
24. The objectors were ridiculed for their efforts by those in power.
25. The objectors called for a public referendum on the issue.
26. The objectors met with community leaders to discuss their grievances.
27. The objectors accused the corporation of violating environmental regulations.
28. The objectors sent a letter to the governor asking for their support.
29. The objectors hoped to garner enough support to overturn the decision.
30. The objectors were determined to fight for what they believed in.

Common Phases

1. The objectors argued that the project was too risky; that the cost was too high; and that it would cause environmental damage.
2. The objectors claimed that the proposed policy was discriminatory; that it would infringe on their rights; and that it lacked transparency.
3. The objectors expressed concern that the development would negatively impact the community's character; that it would increase traffic congestion; and that it would lead to higher crime rates.
4. The objectors disputed the evidence presented by the proponents; asserted that the plan lacked feasibility; and criticized the lack of public input.
5. The objectors maintained that the proposed legislation was unconstitutional; that it did not consider their cultural traditions; and that it was based on flawed data.