"Remittiturs" Example Sentences
1. The judge issued several remittiturs to reduce the damages awarded in the case.
2. The plaintiff agreed to accept the remittitur in order to avoid a lengthy appeal process.
3. The defendant's attorney argued against the remittitur, saying it was still too high.
4. The remittitur was based on the idea that the original award was excessive or unsupported by the evidence.
5. The judge used the remittitur to correct what he saw as an error in the jury's decision.
6. The remittitur was seen by some as a compromise between the parties involved.
7. The plaintiff was disappointed with the remittitur, but accepted it in the end.
8. The remittitur was issued after careful consideration of all the evidence presented at trial.
9. The defendant breathed a sigh of relief when the remittitur was announced.
10. The judge's decision to order a remittitur was controversial, with many legal experts weighing in on both sides.
11. The remittitur reduced the damages awarded to the plaintiff by almost half.
12. The remittitur was intended to ensure that the plaintiff received fair compensation for their injuries, without bankrupting the defendant.
13. The defendant's insurance company agreed to pay the remittitur in order to avoid further litigation.
14. The remittitur was a way to correct what the jury saw as an inconsistent or irregular decision.
15. The plaintiff's attorney filed an objection to the remittitur, but it was ultimately denied.
16. The remittitur was seen by some as a way for the judge to maintain control over the outcome of the case.
17. The defendant was relieved that the remittitur was not higher than it was.
18. The judge's decision to issue a remittitur was based on legal precedent and common sense.
19. The plaintiff was happy with the remittitur, as it was still a significant sum of money.
20. The defendant's attorney argued that the remittitur would be unfair, but his objections were overruled.
21. The remittitur was not well-received by either side, but both ultimately agreed to it.
22. The judge issued the remittitur as a way to ensure that the jury did not over-compensate the plaintiff.
23. The plaintiff's attorney argued against the remittitur, saying that it did not adequately compensate his client for their injuries.
24. The remittitur was seen as a way to balance the interests of both parties involved in the case.
25. The defendant's attorney argued that the remittitur was too high, and would cause undue hardship for his client.
26. The plaintiff accepted the remittitur reluctantly, but understood that it was the best outcome possible in the circumstances.
27. The remittitur was issued after an extensive review of the evidence and testimony presented at trial.
28. The defendant was pleased with the remittitur, as it was much lower than the original amount awarded.
29. The plaintiff was disappointed with the remittitur, but appreciated that it was still a substantial sum of money.
30. The judge's decision to issue a remittitur was based on his belief that the original award was excessive or unsupported by the evidence presented at trial.
Common Phases
1. The court granted the defendant's motion for remittitur; the damages awarded by the jury were deemed excessive.
2. The plaintiff's attorney filed a motion for remittitur; arguing that the jury's verdict was inadequate and did not fully compensate their client for their injuries.
3. The judge issued a remittitur order; reducing the amount of damages awarded by the jury to an amount deemed appropriate by the court.
4. The defendant appealed the court's remittitur; claiming that the damages awarded were still excessive and not supported by the evidence presented at trial.
5. The plaintiff's attorney accepted the remittitur; recognizing that it was the best possible outcome for their client given the circumstances of the case.
6. The court rejected the defendant's argument against the remittitur; upholding the judge's decision to reduce the damages awarded by the jury.