Reparations example sentences

"Reparations" Example Sentences

1. The nation struggled for decades over calls for reparations for past discrimination.
2. Activists have demanded reparations for the descendants of slaves.
3. Some argued that monetary reparations could help address the lingering effects of centuries of oppression.
4. Others opposed reparations on the grounds that no one alive today was directly responsible for slavery.
5. The question of reparations has divided the country along racial and political lines.
6. A bill to establish a commission to study potential reparations proposals was introduced in Congress.
7. Indigenous groups have sought financial reparations for the theft of their lands.
8. After the war, Germany paid reparations to the Allies.
9. Jewish organizations have long debated how to obtain reparations from European countries for the losses during the Holocaust.
10. Victims of government programs like forced sterilization have called for monetary reparations.
11. Wealth transfers, land grants, and other non-monetary forms of reparations have been proposed.
12. The foundation provided financial assistance and educational programs as a form of reparation for past harms.
13. Survivors demanded an official apology and material reparations from the government.
14. Reparations treaties ended past conflicts by compensating for damages and losses.
15. Victims argued that without reparations, true justice could not be achieved.
16. The government initially rejected calls for official reparations for interned Japanese Americans.
17. Lawsuits seeking reparations for slavery were dismissed by courts.
18. After decades of debate, the issue of reparations remains divisive and unresolved.
19. The movement for African American reparations gained new momentum in recent years.
20. Proponents argue that reparations are needed to address the cumulative effects of centuries of discrimination.
21. Opponents contend that reparations would unfairly punish people today for the sins of past generations.
22. Calls for reparations highlight the continuing legacy of racism and injustice in our society.
23. How reparations would be structured and funded remains hotly debated.
24. The country has yet to provide meaningful reparations for its history of conquest and racism.
25. Financial compensation may be only one small part of a broader program of social reparations.
26. Activists are renewing the fight for Holocaust reparations from European governments and financial institutions.
27. The struggle for reparations remains tied to the larger quest for justice and equality.
28. Critics argue that no amount of monetary reparations could ever fully compensate for the horrors of slavery.
29. Proponents say that without reparations, healing and reconciliation will remain out of reach.
30. The issue of reparations tests our willingness as a society to confront past injustices honestly.
31. Advocates call reparations a matter of basic moral duty and restorative justice.
32. Critics fear reparations would open the floodgates to endless demands for compensation.
33. Proponents say reparations could help repair broken bonds of trust between communities.
34. Reparations would require deep societal transformation, not just financial payments.
35. Failing to pursue reparations signals society's unwillingness to atone for grave injustices.
36. The issue of reparations lays bare unresolved questions about national identity and historical memory.
37. Reparations seek to balance the scales of justice and make amends for grave wrongs.
38. Critics argue that victims of injustice should seek redress through the legal system, not reparations.
39. Proponents argue that the suffering caused by discrimination cannot be measured in dollars alone.
40. Reparations are a matter of basic restorative justice, not political correctness or handouts.
41. Critics fear reparations would set an unsustainable precedent for endless claims and grievances.
42. The fight for reparations continues generations after the injustices occurred.
43. Victims of genocide and ethnic cleansing have demanded financial reparations.
44. Treaties ending colonial rule often included provisions for economic reparations.
45. Calls for reparations reflect a desire for societies to achieve closure and healing.
46. Reparations have the potential to rebuild fractured communities and restore human dignity.
47. The idea of reparations has gained new attention amid growing racial tensions.
48. Proponents see reparations as a step toward acknowledging and correcting historic wrongs.
49. Experts debate how governments can best structure reparations to achieve sustainable change.
50. Critics argue that reparations risk creating the perception of victims as helpless and dependent.
60. The issue of reparations forces us to confront our own responsibility for injustice, even across generations.

Common Phases

1. The issue of reparations for slavery continues to divide Americans.
2. Calls have been growing for the U.S. government to pay economic reparations to the descendants of slaves.
3. Advocates for reparations argue that past injustices still reverberate through society today and that compensation is needed to remedy that harm.
4. Opponents argue that the government cannot be held responsible for actions taken by long-dead officials and that reparations would be too costly.
5. No federal reparations bill has passed Congress, though some state and local governments have issued symbolic apologies for slavery.
6. Germany paid massive economic reparations after World War I and World War II.
7. Some nations have provided official apologies and other forms of reparations for historical human rights abuses and crimes against minorities.
8. The U.S. paid reparations to Japanese Americans interned during World War II.
9. South Africa implemented a system of reparations and truth commissions after ending apartheid.
10. Indigenous groups have called for reparations for land takings and mistreatment.
11. Activists argue that black communities continue to suffer economically from the legacy of slavery and oppression, and reparations could help close that wealth gap.
12. If implemented, reparations could come in the form of cash payments, education grants, business loans, healthcare benefits, or other social programs to aid black communities.
13. Critics counter that such assistance should be based on economic need rather than race.
14. Some argue that estimates of potential costs for slavery reparations are too extreme.
15. Debates over the proper forms and recipients of possible reparations are complex and contentious.
16. Reparations would acknowledge the wrongs of the past and signify a commitment to addressing systemic disadvantages going forward, proponents say.
17. Finalizing the demands for comprehensive reparations is difficult due to the complexity of defining who deserves compensation and in what amounts.
18. The United Nations has declared that victims of racial discrimination have a right to seek just and adequate reparations.
19. Arguing that the legacy of slavery is tangibly tied to poverty and inequality today, activists continued to push for congressional hearings on national reparations.
20. Senators received hundreds of letters calling for reparations legislation to be debated and voted upon.
21. The United States government provided reparations to Japanese Americans interned during World War II as compensation for property seized and personal losses suffered.
22. Black activists have long advocated for reparations for the descendants of slaves, noting that other groups that suffered from government-sanctioned injustice have received some form of compensation.
23. The lawsuit demanded both individual monetary damages and congressional hearings to determine an appropriate amount of reparations for the lingering effects of slavery.
24. The mainstream opposition to reparations claims that no currently living Americans were responsible for slavery, making compensation unjust and unworkable.
25. Reparations are rarely paid by contemporary governments for the actions of distant historical predecessors.
26. Critics contend that reparations are an ill-fitted and unjust solution for the tremendous harms inflicted by slavery.
27. The violence and intimidation carried out against freed slaves by the Ku Klux Klan and other groups has also been cited as cause for additional reparations.
28. Reparations payments and programs represent an attempt to redress collective suffering and make amends for large-scale historical injustices.
29. Only a handful of countries have paid some form of cash reparations for crimes related to slavery.
30. The abuses endured by enslaved populations and the lasting effects on their descendants merit compensation and rehabilitation, supporters argue.
31. Calls for slavery reparations have grown increasingly loud, though legislation establishing a reparations program has yet to gain traction in Congress.
32. The truth and reconciliation commissions instituted in South Africa following the end of apartheid aimed to grant some measure of reparations to victims through formal apologies, amnesty provisions, and victim compensation funds.
33. Providing reparations to the descendants of slaves could help acknowledge the horrors of that institution and provide resources to address the lasting consequences of those wrongs.
34. Critics argue that any attempt to calculate appropriate compensation for the harms of slavery would be fraught with complexities and difficulties.
35. Advocates for reparations point out that black communities continue to experience disparities in access to education, employment, health care, and other opportunities due directly to slavery and subsequent discrimination.
36. Scholars continue to debate what specific form reparations should take, how recipients would be selected, and the exact types of harms that compensation should address.
37. Some activist groups have formed their own reparations programs, providing financial grants and social services to black communities independently of the government.
38. Politicians have largely shied away from embracing proposals for nationwide slavery reparations due to the controversial and complex nature of such plans.
39. The South African government officially apologized for the wrongs of apartheid and instituted various affirmative action programs as part of a broad reparations framework.
40. Most Western countries have generally avoided paying specific reparations for their historical involvement in the African slave trade.
41. The United Nations has passed resolutions recognizing a "moral obligation" for slave-trade related reparations but called on individual nations to determine appropriate methods of compensation.
42. African governments and organizations have argued strenuously for cash payments and debt forgiveness as forms of reparation for the transatlantic slave trade.
43. Germany's substantial World War II reparations to Israel set an international precedent for paying material compensation for historical injustices.
44. Various proposals have been floated for reparations programs that target education, health care, and business initiatives to narrow entrenched racial economic disparities.
45. Proponents of reparations argue that material compensation represents the only way to begin correcting the moral imbalance created by past injustices.
46. However, opponents maintain there are more effective and socially unifying ways to address modern racial inequality than through divisive reparations programs based on historical grievances.
47. A robust national conversation on acknowledgment, atonement and reparations could help the country make progress toward healing from the wounds of slavery, advocates say.
48. Public debate over reparations for slavery continues while little political appetite exists for actual legislation that would allocate funding for compensation.
49. Countries that have enacted comprehensive reparations programs sought to simultaneously acknowledge past wrongs, provide resources to victims and survivors, and work toward reconciliation and closure.
50. Meaningful historical acknowledgment and material compensation could serve as an important first step toward repairing relationships severed by legacies of injustice, proponents argue.
51. Any reparations program must also seek to bridge divisions and promote healing within communities, not just provide monetary remuneration for past wrongs.
52. Reparations cannot fully compensate for gross human rights violations, but may represent a necessary form of restorative justice for historical wrongs.
53. The unfortunate reality is that reparations alone cannot unravel the complex knot of racial injustice entrenched over centuries of history.
54. But symbolically and practically, appropriate measures of recompense and recognition for past inhumanity could help build more just and equitable societies going forward.
55. Comprehensive conversations on the difficult and multifaceted issues surrounding reparations may ultimately prove more valuable than any monetary sums allocated.
56. Calls for slavery reparations will likely persist until the United States finds a way to reconcile with its shameful past and chart a more hopeful path for the future.
57. However, implementing viable reparations programs that appropriately redress historical injustices while uniting rather than dividing citizens remains an immensely complex challenge.
58. Critics argue that reparations are ill-suited to rectify the enduring impacts of brutal historical injustices like slavery.
59. Proponents counter that comprehensive reparations, including both material compensation and institutional reform, represent an essential step toward reckoning with and moving beyond unaddressed historical wrongs.
60. The debate itself opens an important space for reflecting honestly on the legacies of the past, present impediments to justice, and how we might collectively build a more equitable future.