Devolution example sentences

Related (2): decentralization, delegation

"Devolution" Example Sentences

The devolution of powers to local governments empowered communities to make more decisions affecting their lives.
The devolution of powers from the federal government has led to greater autonomy for states.
Scotland's desire for more autonomy led to the devolution of additional powers from the UK Parliament.
After decades of centralization, there are now calls for devolution and decentralization of government to bring services closer to people.
The process of devolution created new regional governments with control over matters like healthcare, education and transport.
The new act of devolution granted the assembly powers over a range of public services and funds.
The national government has promised further devolution to the regions as long as they demonstrate effective use of funds.
Critics argue that devolution has weakened national cohesion and created uneven regional development.
Proponents of devolution argue that it leads to more regional representation and custom policies to suit local needs.
The devolution of powers to local governments has opened up opportunities for community participation and development.
With devolution, came responsibility as local governments now had to raise funds to finance the new powers.
Opponents of further devolution warn that it may lead to demands for outright independence.
Local officials welcomed the devolution, saying it would give them more tools to tackle poverty and unemployment.
There are calls for a deeper and bolder programme of devolution to truly empower cities and regions.
The piecemeal devolution of powers has failed to transform public services and address regional inequality.
The devolution of authority was gradual as the central government moved to build capacity at local levels.
Devolution requires coordinating different levels of government and agencies to deliver integrated services.
Success of devolution depends on adequate funding and political will to cede powers from the centre.
The plan for further devolution of powers aims to create a fairer and more sustainable system of governance.
Devolution could empower people to decide policies based on their needs and priorities.
There are concerns that devolution may widen regional disparities and create an uneven playing field.
Backers of further devolution argue it would promote growth through experimentation and competition.
There are calls for a careful balance between devolution and national frameworks to ensure coherence.
Devolution has the potential to make governance more democratic and citizen-centric.
Proponents of devolution emphasize the benefits of bringing decision-making closer to citizens.
Critics argue that devolution could lead to a fragmented system that works against national unity.
The devolution of sovereignty poses challenges for central governments and regional bodies alike.
Devolution advocates promise more flexibility, diversity and responsiveness in public services.
Devolution offers the opportunity to empower cities and regions to drive economic growth.
Further devolution has been called for to boost local economies and deliver on people's aspirations.
Devolution involves transfer of power from central to subnational levels of government.
The powers devolved include control over budgets, policymaking and implementation of functions.
People hoped devolution would lead to better governance, efficiency and accountability.
There are arguments for and against further devolution along ethical, economic and political lines.
Devolution is designed to bring decision-making closer to those most affected by public policies.
Devolution reforms should aim for an optimal balance of power between different levels of government.
Proponents argue that devolution incentivizes innovation and promotes competition among regions.
Devolution requires balancing autonomy with coordination to ensure policy coherence and equity.
Critics argue that further devolution may enhance sectional interests at the expense of national unity.
Success requires political goodwill, effective institutions and adequate funding at regional levels.
Devolution offers hope for more effective, efficient and responsive public services closer to citizens.
There are calls to strengthen devolution through greater funding, clarity of powers and local flexibility.
Devolution allows for locally tailored solutions to address social, economic and environmental issues.
Critics worry that devolution may risk widening the wealth gap and uneven regional development.
Further devolution could promote competitive federalism and boost growth through decentralization.
Greater devolution requires capacity building and skills development at subnational government levels.
Devolution provides an opportunity for experimentation and innovation to improve public service delivery.
Achieving the benefits of devolution requires adequate compensation and support for weaker regions.
Calls for further devolution reflect dissatisfaction with the status quo and demand for greater autonomy.
There are concerns that devolution may lead to fragmentation of governance and policy inconsistencies.
The promise of devolution lies in bringing governance closer to the people through subsidiarity.
Devolution should strive for an optimal balance between local autonomy and national unity and identity.
Critics argue that devolution could make national planning and coordination more complex and costly.
Success depends on well-designed institutions, strategies and governance mechanisms at local levels.
Effective devolution requires coordination between different government departments and programs.
Devolution seeks to empower communities to find their own solutions to local problems.
Many argue that further devolution is necessary to increase accountability and responsiveness.
Further devolution must be accompanied by measures to ensure equitable access to public services.
Devolution reforms aim to empower subnational governments to be more responsive and innovative.