Diffs example sentences

"Diffs" Example Sentences

1. The code diffs looked minor, but caused major issues.
2. Our project manager reviewed the diffs before approving the merge.
3. I spent hours going over the text diffs to find the errors.
4. We ran diffs on the database backups to identify changes.
5. The version control system tracked all file diffs and commits.
6. I applied the diffs to my local copy of the codebase.
7. Git calculates diffs between file revisions to track changes.
8. The diffs highlighted the added, removed, and modified lines.
9. They reviewed the diffs between the old and new designs.
10. SVN uses three-way diffs to resolve conflicts during merges.
11. The diffs showed that several lines of code had been deleted.
12. The diffs clearly illustrated all changes between documents.
13. The programmer generated a diff to see what had been updated.
14. The diffs were applied to update the production environment.
15. We could undo or revert the code diffs as needed.
16. I used diff to compare two text files and view differences.
17. We checked diffs before every new build to ensure everything worked.
18. We ran diffs to verify the patch was applied correctly.
19. We needed to resolve conflicts in the git diffs before merging branches.
20. The diffs between camera exposures showed moving objects more clearly.
21. The bit diffs were nearly imperceptible to the human eye.
22. Diffs between program versions revealed a critical bug.
23. The diffs showed several conflicting lines that needed to be resolved.
24. I exported diffs of necessary changes before wiping my machine.
25. The diffs between strains of the virus pointed to its origin.
26. They generated diffs for each new patch to test against existing code.
27. Code diffs streamlined development by highlighting vital changes.
28. The diffs revealed subtleties in her prose lost in the final drafts.
29. He generated text diffs to compare various drafts and versions.
30. Configuration diffs helped identify configuration problems.
31. They looked for anomalies in the market analysis diffs.
32. We used diff libraries to generate formatted file diffs.
33. The diffs revealed hundreds of spelling and grammatical errors.
34. Bit diffs highlighted modifications between two binary files.
35. They scanned the diffs for potential security vulnerabilities.
36. Git uses diff algorithms to calculate file diffs efficiently.
37. The color-coded diffs clearly illustrated text additions and removals.
38. Version diff tools generate change reports and reconcile differences.
39. The diffs highlighted discrepancies in the financial reports.
40. The diffs were heavily conflicted and required manual reconciliation.
41. The diffs helped pinpoint when and why the product began failing.
42. The diffs between iterations helped gauge progress on the project.
43. The diffs revealed intentional edits designed to obfuscate the text.
44. Merging the diffs into master required some manual conflict resolution.
45. I reviewed the code diffs and approved the pull request.
46. The diffs did not highlight any major discrepancies in the data sets.
47. The logic in the diffs looked sound so I approved the changes.
48. The diffs made identifying problematic areas of code quick and easy.
49. Conflicting diffs required some refactoring to resolve smoothly.
50. Reviewing configuration diffs was the first step in the testing process.
51. The diffs between channels revealed evidence of fraud.
52. The three-way merge highlighted conflicting diffs that needed resolution.
53. The diffs between commits allowed us to revert unintended changes.
54. The software analyzed diffs while learning to detect malicious changes.
55. The diffs between groups were stark and surprising.
56. The diffs highlighted minor font and spacing issues.
57. Git diffs helped isolate and roll back unintended changes.
58. We routinely scanned diffs for signs of theft or sabotage.
59. The diffs revealed no unexpected or erroneous changes.
60. The diffs passed automated checks but required human verification.

Common Phases

1. I ran diffs on the two codebases and found many changes.
2. I compared the files and created a diffs document showing the changes between them.
3. When merging branches, reviewing the diffs helps ensure no important changes were missed.
4. After committing my changes, I pushed the code to the remote repository and my teammate pulled the latest version to review the diffs.
5. The code reviewer looked over the diffs and approved the changes in the pull request.
6. We discussed the diffs and made a few minor tweaks before merging the branch into main.
7. I need to generate the text diffs between the two versions of the documents.
8. The patch file contained the diffs needed to update the codebase.
9. GitHub shows the diffs between commits to help track changes over time.
10. The version control system saves the diffs for each commit, allowing us to revert changes if needed.
11. The software produced a high-level summary of the diffs between the two files.
12. The diffs highlighted changes in lines, words, and characters.
13. I carefully reviewed all 500 line diffs before approving the code change.
14. The tool can generate diffs in several file formats for your convenience.
15. I examined the HTML diffs to verify the visual changes between web page versions.
16. Merging branches resulted in numerous merge conflicts showing up in the diffs.
17. I had to manually resolve several conflicts by reviewing the diffs and editing the code.
18. The diffs highlighted the differences in variable names and function definitions.
19. The database design diffs showed added, deleted, and modified fields.
20. The graphical diffs made it easy to visualize changes to images and layouts.
21. GitHub showed a colored diffs view, making it simple to scan through changes quickly.
22. When reviewing diffs, commented out code and extra whitespace shouldn't be counted as real changes.
23. The diffs clearly flagged additions, removals, and modifiations.
24. The tool helps engineers analyze diffs between database schema versions.
25. The diffs clearly identified changes to table names, primary keys and foreign keys.
26. We carefully reviewed all the main schema diffs before deploying the database update.
27. The diffs highlighted numerous style changes but no major functional changes.
28. The diffs summary showed over 100 lines changed between versions.
29. I meticulously examined every line of diffs to verify the code worked as intended.
30. The binary diffs showed where file contents differed at a raw data level.
31. They printed out the text diffs and reviewed the changes line by line.
32. After generating the diffs, they worked to resolve any conflicts between the versions.
33. They used the side-by-side diffs view to compare changes simultaneously.
34. The diffs highlighted changes in structure, syntax and commenting.
35. The server automatically generated a diffs file for each code commit.
36. Most engineers prefer a unified diffs format for code review.
37. She carefully audited each line of the 2,000 line diffs file.
38. They applied the patch file containing the function diffs to update the codebase.
39. The merge request included a full diffs view of all proposed changes.
40. After integration, we compared the post-merge diffs to the expected changes.
41. The final diffs were much smaller than anticipated, suggesting missed changes.
42. They re-reviewed the previous diffs to locate any omitted modifications.
43. When reviewing diffs, be sure to consider the logical flow and functionality, not just syntax.
44. We analyzed the style diffs separately to speed review of functional changes.
45. The diffs clearly flagged where variables were renamed between versions.
46. The patch diffs were surprisingly minimal, indicating a well-structured change.
47. He spent hours poring over thousands of line diffs to verify correctness.
48. The binary diffs revealed numerous bit-level changes between file versions.
49. The tool can generate unified, context and inline diffs for file comparisons.
50. The colored diffs presented changes in green for additions and red for removals.
51. He examined every diffs line to ensure functional equivalence between revisions.
52. The XML diffs highlighted changes to tags, attributes and element content.
53. Developers use diffs to review, approve and audit code commits.
54. They carefully arbitrated any disputes arising from interpretation of the diffs.
55. I used the side-by-side diffs view to analyze the visual changes to the web page layout.
56. They rebased their branch on main and resolved the resulting diffs via merge.
57. I quickly scanned through the diffs to check for any obvious errors.
58. The SQL diffs highlighted added, deleted and modified tables and columns.
59. Merge conflicts show up as separated diffs in code review.
60. They ran the diffs through a linter to flag any style issues for improvement.