Editorials example sentences

"Editorials" Example Sentences

1. The newspaper published editorials supporting the new tax policy.
2. The editorials in the magazine often criticize government policies.
3. The editorials called for immediate action on climate change.
4. The editorials offered opinions on a variety of current events.
5. The editorial staff gathered to decide which editorials to publish that week.
6. The editor wrote several strong editorials opposing the war.
7. The editorials condemned the violence and demanded justice.
8. The editorials advocated for voting reforms and campaign finance transparency.
9. The editorials took a liberal stance on social issues.
10. The editorials took a conservative position on economic policy.
11. The editorials adopted a neutral tone but encouraged political debate.
12. The provocative editorials sparked controversy.
13. The well-argued editorials received praise from readers.
14. The newspaper ran editorials every day except Sunday.
15. The authoritative editorials carried a lot of weight with readers.
16. The harshly-worded editorials alienated some subscribers.
17. The editorials adopted an informal but engaging tone.
18. The caustic editorials sparked an intense debate.
19. The eloquent editorials inspired readers to get involved.
20. The newspaper became known for its incisive editorials.
21. The editorials attempted to influence public opinion.
22. The editor wrote passionate editorials about income inequality.
23. The newspaper received countless letters in response to its editorials.
24. The strongly-worded editorials reflected the values of the paper's owners.
25. The newspaper's editorials set the political agenda for the week.
26. The biting editorials criticized both political parties.
27. The newspaper used its editorial page to endorse candidates.
28. The new editor used editorials to assert his views on key issues.
29. The newspaper's editorials were studied by scholars of public opinion.
30. The editorials took a skeptical view of all official pronouncements.
31. Activists used the editorials to rally public support for change.
32. The editorial staff met weekly to decide which topics to address that week.
33. Readers relied on the editorials to inform and shape their opinions.
34. The editorials called for political action on a range of urgent issues.
35. The editorials often provided a historical perspective on current events.
36. Columnists responded to the editorials with opposing viewpoints.
37. The independent editorials championed human rights and freedoms.
38. The editorial calling for tax reform received national attention.
39. The editorial page became required reading for political elites.
40. The editorials were considered thought-provoking and informative.
41. The newspaper became known for its insightful and independent editorials.
42. The editorials addressed readers as engaged citizens of a democracy.
43. Activist groups seized on the editorials to advance their causes.
44. The searing editorials prompted an official governmental response.
45. The newspaper's editorials often broke new ground on social issues.
46. The forceful editorials contributed to public debate on pressing issues.
47. The provocative editorials struck a nerve with many readers.
48. The newspaper sacrificed circulation to maintain its independent editorials.
49. The eloquent editorials held politicians accountable for their promises.
50. The biting editorials lambasted both parties for political inertia.
51. Opinion columns argued against the positions taken in the editorials.
52. Politicians waited anxiously to see which issues the editorials would address.
53. The newspaper gained credibility for its principled and independent editorials.
54. The editorial predicted that the economy would improve within a year.
55. The editorial lamented the increasing influence of money in politics.
56. The staff editorial took a neutral view of the controversial proposal.
57. The opinion editor wrote a scathing editorial condemning police brutality.
58. Readers wrote letters to the editor in response to the provocative editorials.
59. Many scholars consider the newspaper's editorials to be of historic significance.
60. Subscribers read the editorials to learn how the paper interpreted current events.

Common Phases

1. The editorials in the newspaper argue against government corruption.
2. The editorials criticize the ineffective social programs.
3. The editorials call for more transparency and accountability in local politics.
4. The editorials promote social issues like education funding and addressing homelessness.
5. The editorials frequently endorse candidates for political office.
6. The editorials express the newspaper's institutional viewpoint on current events.
7. The angry editorials condemn the government's response to the crisis.
8. The newspaper is known for its hard-hitting editorials on political issues.
9. The editorials advocate for policy solutions to social problems.
10. In her opinion editorials, she argues passionately for women's rights.
11. The occasional editorials in the magazine touch on broad philosophical issues.
12. The editorials remain respectful while firmly defending a position.
13. Editorials usually feature the strongest and most passionate writing in a newspaper.
14. The editorials regularly call for increased taxes to fund education.
15. His opinion editorials in the local paper address community issues important to residents.
16. The newspaper's editorials took an isolationist stance on foreign policy.
17. Editorials aim to persuade readers to support a particular viewpoint.
18. The editorials provide thoughtful commentary on current events.
19. Many of the editorials argue for more government regulation of private business.
20. The harsh editorials denounced the government's handling of the crisis.
21. The editorial pages feature columns on local issues in addition to editorials.
22. The editorials often promote progressive social policies.
23. She wrote passionate editorials decrying the lack of jobs for youth.
24. The magazine's weekly editorials address economic challenges facing the nation.
25. The editorials tend to lean conservative in political orientation.
26. The editorials call for bold action to address climate change.
27. The biting editorials lambasted the leaders' poor responses.
28. Editorials express informed judgments or opinions about issues of public interest.
29. The editorials took a neutral stance on the political disagreements.
30. The editorials garnered both praise and criticism for their controversial arguments.
31. The belligerent editorials lambasted the opposing political party.
32. The scathing editorials excoriated the government's handling of the scandal.
33. Editorials offer commentary intended to influence public opinion or policy.
34. The editorials took a firm stance against raising taxes.
35. The moderate editorials avoided extremist viewpoints.
36. Editorials often reflect the dominant perspectives within an organization.
37. Editorials provide considered judgments of social issues and controversies.
38. The strongly worded editorials condemned the unjust laws.
39. The newspaper's editorials took a progressive stance on social issues.
40. The even-handed editorials adopted a balanced viewpoint.
41. The provocative editorials sparked heated debate in the community.
42. Editorials convey the official opinions of a newspaper, magazine, or news organization.
43. The ringing editorials implored the leaders to change course.
44. The thoughtful editorials explored solutions to complex societal problems.
45. The stirring editorials rallied the public to take action.
46. The reasoned editorials argued logically for a particular policy.
47. The measured editorials carefully avoided inflammatory rhetoric.
48. Read the editorials to learn the paper's institutional position on the issue.
49. The radical editorials advocated for sweeping political changes.
50. The editorial pages often contain the most fervent voices of an institution.
51. The business-friendly editorials supported free market policies.
52. The impassioned editorials campaigned for social justice.
53. Editorials often reveal the biases and assumptions within an institution.
54. The hard-hitting editorials took the government to task.
55. The sharp editorials criticized ineffectual leaders.
56. The biting editorials excoriated the bureaucratic responses.
57. The caustic editorials attacked the opposing viewpoint.
58. The sober editorials called for public reflection and dialogue.
59. The newspaper's editorials took a skeptical stance on new technologies.
60. The editorials pushed for bold solutions to address societal problems.