Editorials example sentences
Related (10): commentary, critiques, viewpoints, perspectives, analysis, essays, columns, reviews, observations, musings.
"Editorials" Example Sentences
Common Phrases
- The editorials in the newspaper argue against government corruption.
- The editorials criticize the ineffective social programs.
- The editorials call for more transparency and accountability in local politics.
- The editorials promote social issues like education funding and addressing homelessness.
- The editorials frequently endorse candidates for political office.
- The editorials express the newspaper's institutional viewpoint on current events.
- The angry editorials condemn the government's response to the crisis.
- The newspaper is known for its hard-hitting editorials on political issues.
- The editorials advocate for policy solutions to social problems.
- In her opinion editorials, she argues passionately for women's rights.
- The occasional editorials in the magazine touch on broad philosophical issues.
- The editorials remain respectful while firmly defending a position.
- Editorials usually feature the strongest and most passionate writing in a newspaper.
- The editorials regularly call for increased taxes to fund education.
- His opinion editorials in the local paper address community issues important to residents.
- The newspaper's editorials took an isolationist stance on foreign policy.
- Editorials aim to persuade readers to support a particular viewpoint.
- The editorials provide thoughtful commentary on current events.
- Many of the editorials argue for more government regulation of private business.
- The harsh editorials denounced the government's handling of the crisis.
- The editorial pages feature columns on local issues in addition to editorials.
- The editorials often promote progressive social policies.
- She wrote passionate editorials decrying the lack of jobs for youth.
- The magazine's weekly editorials address economic challenges facing the nation.
- The editorials tend to lean conservative in political orientation.
- The editorials call for bold action to address climate change.
- The biting editorials lambasted the leaders' poor responses.
- Editorials express informed judgments or opinions about issues of public interest.
- The editorials took a neutral stance on the political disagreements.
- The editorials garnered both praise and criticism for their controversial arguments.
- The belligerent editorials lambasted the opposing political party.
- The scathing editorials excoriated the government's handling of the scandal.
- Editorials offer commentary intended to influence public opinion or policy.
- The editorials took a firm stance against raising taxes.
- The moderate editorials avoided extremist viewpoints.
- Editorials often reflect the dominant perspectives within an organization.
- Editorials provide considered judgments of social issues and controversies.
- The strongly worded editorials condemned the unjust laws.
- The newspaper's editorials took a progressive stance on social issues.
- The even-handed editorials adopted a balanced viewpoint.
- The provocative editorials sparked heated debate in the community.
- Editorials convey the official opinions of a newspaper, magazine, or news organization.
- The ringing editorials implored the leaders to change course.
- The thoughtful editorials explored solutions to complex societal problems.
- The stirring editorials rallied the public to take action.
- The reasoned editorials argued logically for a particular policy.
- The measured editorials carefully avoided inflammatory rhetoric.
- Read the editorials to learn the paper's institutional position on the issue.
- The radical editorials advocated for sweeping political changes.
- The editorial pages often contain the most fervent voices of an institution.
- The business-friendly editorials supported free market policies.
- The impassioned editorials campaigned for social justice.
- Editorials often reveal the biases and assumptions within an institution.
- The hard-hitting editorials took the government to task.
- The sharp editorials criticized ineffectual leaders.
- The biting editorials excoriated the bureaucratic responses.
- The caustic editorials attacked the opposing viewpoint.
- The sober editorials called for public reflection and dialogue.
- The newspaper's editorials took a skeptical stance on new technologies.
- The editorials pushed for bold solutions to address societal problems.