Evaluators example sentences

"Evaluators" Example Sentences

1. The evaluators unanimously agreed that the project was a success.
2. The evaluators assigned high scores to the presentation.
3. The evaluators assessed the effectiveness of the marketing campaign.
4. The evaluators criticized the lack of detail in the proposal.
5. The evaluators deemed the experiment inconclusive.
6. The evaluators found flaws in the logic of the argument.
7. The evaluators gave constructive feedback for improvement.
8. The evaluators judged the performance to be mediocre.
9. The evaluators noted the impressive attention to detail.
10. The evaluators observed a lack of diversity in the team.
11. The evaluators praised the organization of the event.
12. The evaluators questioned the viability of the business plan.
13. The evaluators rated the design as visually appealing.
14. The evaluators recommended changes to the methodology.
15. The evaluators scrutinized the data for inconsistencies.
16. The evaluators suggested alternative solutions to the problem.
17. The evaluators tested the software for functionality.
18. The evaluators used a rubric to grade the assignment.
19. The evaluators verified the accuracy of the calculations.
20. The evaluators were impartial in their assessment.
21. The evaluators x-rayed the structure for defects.
22. The evaluators yielded a conclusion based on the evidence.
23. The evaluators zoomed in on the specific details of the proposal.
24. The evaluators analyzed the market trends for potential growth.
25. The evaluators compiled a comprehensive report of their findings.
26. The evaluators deliberated on the best course of action.
27. The evaluators examined the potential risks of the project.
28. The evaluators focused on the quality of the product.
29. The evaluators graded the essays based on originality.
30. The evaluators highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the argument.

Common Phases

1. Testing the evaluators' effectiveness;
2. Gathering feedback from the evaluators;
3. Reviewing results with the evaluators;
4. Adjusting the evaluators based on feedback;
5. Evaluating the performance of the evaluators themselves.