"Examiners" Example Sentences
1. The examiners were impressed with the student's essay.
2. The examiners are conducting an investigation into the company's finances.
3. The examiners were strict and unforgiving during the test.
4. The examiners had a hard time deciding which candidate to hire.
5. The examiners found several errors in the report.
6. The examiners were surprised by the level of knowledge displayed by the students.
7. The examiners asked some challenging questions during the interview.
8. The examiners recommended that the product be recalled.
9. The examiners determined that the athlete had been using performance-enhancing drugs.
10. The examiners were satisfied with the safety protocols in place at the factory.
11. The examiners scrutinized every detail of the project.
12. The examiners praised the artist's attention to detail.
13. The examiners gave the candidate a high score for their presentation skills.
14. The examiners noted that the company needed to improve its customer service.
15. The examiners evaluated the effectiveness of the new marketing strategy.
16. The examiners were shocked by the lack of ethical standards in the business.
17. The examiners recommended changes to the curriculum.
18. The examiners were impressed by the candidate's resilience in the face of adversity.
19. The examiners announced that the exam would be postponed due to unforeseen circumstances.
20. The examiners declared that the product was not safe for use.
21. The examiners concluded that the project was a failure.
22. The examiners commended the researchers for their groundbreaking discovery.
23. The examiners cautioned the company against taking unnecessary risks.
24. The examiners suggested that the company invest in research and development.
25. The examiners were satisfied with the progress made by the student.
26. The examiners recommended that the software be updated to fix some bugs.
27. The examiners were impressed by the quality of the presentation.
28. The examiners rejected the proposal due to lack of feasibility.
29. The examiners assessed the implications of the new legislation.
30. The examiners expressed concern over the company's environmental impact.
Common Phases
1. The
examiners meticulously reviewed the test papers; they wanted to ensure accuracy and fairness in grading.
2. After the presentation, the
examiners conferred with each other; they debated on the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.
3. The
examiners asked the candidate a series of questions; they aimed to test the depth of the candidate's knowledge on the subject matter.
4. Upon examining the evidence, the
examiners collaboratively reached a conclusion; they upheld the defendant's innocence.
5. The
examiners evaluated the applicant's skills and experience; they recommended her for the job.
6. During the inspection, the
examiners carefully observed the machinery; they identified potential safety hazards.
7. The
examiners marked the exam papers; they discovered several instances of plagiarism.
8. The
examiners assessed the student's performance; they found that he excelled in critical thinking and problem-solving.
9. The expert
examiners investigated the crime scene; they scrutinized every clue and detail.
10. The
examiners deliberated on the case; they eventually overturned the lower court's ruling.