"Foundationalists" Example Sentences
1. Foundationalists believe that knowledge is built upon a foundation of indubitable beliefs.
2. Some philosophers argue that foundationalists hold an overly simplistic view of knowledge.
3. The debate between foundationalists and coherentists has been ongoing in epistemology.
4. Foundationalists typically hold that there are some beliefs that can be justified without appeal to any further beliefs.
5. Coherentists often criticize foundationalists for their reliance on foundational beliefs.
6. Foundationalists might argue that the laws of logic are examples of beliefs that are properly basic.
7. One of the main challenges facing foundationalists is the problem of the criterion.
8. One criticism of foundationalism is that it fails to account for the role of experience in forming beliefs.
9. Foundationalists might argue that certain perceptual beliefs are properly basic.
10. Coherentists might argue that even if there are foundational beliefs, we cannot know what they are with certainty.
11. Foundationalists might point to the laws of mathematics as other examples of properly basic beliefs.
12. One criticism of foundationalism is that it requires certain beliefs to be self-justifying.
13. Some philosophers argue that the foundationalists' reliance on indubitability is an unrealistic standard.
14. Foundationalists might argue that certain moral beliefs are properly basic.
15. Coherentists might argue that the justification for beliefs comes from their coherence with a larger set of beliefs.
16. The debate between foundationalists and coherentists centers around the question of what makes a belief justified.
17. Foundationalists might argue that certain religious beliefs are properly basic.
18. One criticism of foundationalism is that it leads to an infinite regress of justifications.
19. Some philosophers argue that justification cannot be found solely in the individual belief itself, as foundationalists claim.
20. Foundationalism is often seen as a response to the skepticism that arises from Descartes' doubt.
21. Coherentism is often presented as a more promising alternative to foundationalism.
22. Foundationalists might argue that certain beliefs are innate or "hard-wired" into our minds.
23. One of the key problems for foundationalism is explaining why certain beliefs are properly basic.
24. Some philosophers argue that all beliefs are necessarily interconnected, making the idea of foundational beliefs impossible.
25. Foundationalists might argue that certain aesthetic beliefs are properly basic.
26. The debate between foundationalists and coherentists has many practical implications for fields like law and medicine.
27. Coherentists might argue that justification for beliefs comes from their coherence with our experiences.
28. Some philosophers argue that foundationalism is too strict and doesn't leave room for error or doubt.
29. Foundationalists might argue that certain beliefs are self-evident, requiring no further justification.
30. Coherentism often seeks to explain how we can have justified beliefs in the absence of foundational beliefs.
Common Phases
1.
Foundationalists believe that knowledge is built upon a solid foundation;
2.
Foundationalists argue that there are certain indubitable beliefs upon which all knowledge rests;
3.
Foundationalists maintain that there are basic propositions that are self-evident and certain;
4.
Foundationalists contend that knowledge must have a secure and unimpeachable foundation;
5.
Foundationalists assert that the most basic beliefs cannot be doubted or under any further analysis;
6.
Foundationalists claim that all knowledge must begin with certainties that are beyond question;
7.
Foundationalists advocate for an epistemological approach that prioritizes basic beliefs over all others.