"Impugnador" Example Sentences
1. The impugnador repeatedly questioned the validity of the evidence.
2. It seemed as though the impugnador was determined to undermine the prosecution's case.
3. The impugnador's arguments were often based on conjecture rather than facts.
4. Despite the impugnador's efforts, the jury ultimately found the defendant guilty.
5. The impugnador's cross-examination of the witness was relentless.
6. The impugnador's tactics seemed designed to confuse rather than clarify the facts.
7. The prosecutor was able to counter the impugnador's objections with ease.
8. The judge warned the impugnador to stay on topic and avoid personal attacks.
9. Even the defense attorney was taken aback by the impugnador's aggressive questioning.
10. The impugnador's assertion that the evidence had been tampered with was quickly dismissed.
11. The impugnador's line of questioning seemed to suggest that the witness was lying.
12. The impugnador's accusations were so outrageous that they were almost comical.
13. The impugnador's questioning was so repetitive that it became tedious to listen to.
14. The impugnador's tone was often condescending and dismissive.
15. The impugnador's approach to questioning witnesses was unorthodox, to say the least.
16. The impugnador was notorious for his aggressive cross-examination techniques.
17. The impugnador's tactics were often aimed at discrediting the witness rather than addressing the issue at hand.
18. Even the judge seemed to become frustrated with the impugnador's behavior.
19. The impugnador's insistence on calling into question every aspect of the case was exhausting.
20. The impugnador's reliance on hearsay and conjecture was ultimately his undoing.
21. The impugnador seemed to take pleasure in making the witnesses uncomfortable.
22. The impugnador was unrelenting in his attempts to prove the defendant's innocence.
23. The impugnador's objections were often overruled by the judge.
24. The impugnador seemed to be grasping at straws in his attempts to sway the jury.
25. The impugnador's arguments were often based on technicalities rather than substantive issues.
26. The impugnador's questioning strategy seemed to be to muddy the waters and confuse the jury.
27. The impugnador was able to raise reasonable doubt in the minds of some jurors.
28. The impugnador's behavior during the trial was widely criticized by legal experts.
29. The impugnador's abrasive personality made him difficult to work with.
30. The impugnador's track record in court was mixed, with some notable victories and some embarrassing defeats.
Common Phases
1. El
impugnador cuestionó la validez de las pruebas presentadas;
2. El abogado defensor acusó al
impugnador de intentar tergiversar los hechos;
3. El
impugnador argumentó que el testigo era poco confiable;
4. El juez le pidió al
impugnador que fundamentara su objeción;
5. El
impugnador sostuvo que la evidencia era circunstancial;
6. El fiscal desestimó los argumentos del
impugnador;
7. El
impugnador solicitó revisar los antecedentes del acusado;
8. El
impugnador presentó pruebas contradictorias a las del demandante;
9. El jurado ignoró las objeciones del
impugnador;
10. El
impugnador insistió en que la cadena de custodia de la evidencia había sido violada.