Incriminations example sentences

"Incriminations" Example Sentences

1. The suspect avoided any incriminations during the police interrogation.
2. His statement was full of incriminations against his former business partner.
3. The investigation led to the incriminations of several high-ranking officials.
4. The witness's testimony provided incriminations against the defendant.
5. The prosecutor presented a strong case with multiple incriminations.
6. The lack of evidence resulted in no incriminations being made.
7. There were several incriminations made during the trial that ultimately led to the verdict.
8. He was fired from his job after incriminations surfaced about his unethical behavior.
9. The politician vehemently denied any incriminations of wrongdoing.
10. The forensic evidence provided multiple incriminations against the suspect.
11. She was arrested after the incriminations against her became too great to ignore.
12. The investigation uncovered several incriminations of fraud within the company.
13. The judge dismissed the case due to lack of credible incriminations.
14. The interviewee avoided any incriminations despite the tough questioning.
15. The prosecutor relied heavily on the incriminations made by the witnesses.
16. Her confession provided incriminations against her accomplice.
17. The case was reopened when new incriminations came to light.
18. The defendant's lawyer challenged the validity of the incriminations made against their client.
19. The police department was criticized for relying solely on hearsay incriminations.
20. The incriminations against the CEO were the result of a whistleblowing employee.
21. The victim's statement provided the most significant incriminations.
22. The jury was convinced of the defendant's guilt due to the overwhelming incriminations.
23. The suspect's alibi was proven false through incriminations provided by witnesses.
24. The case was closed due to the lack of strong incriminations.
25. The journalist's investigative report uncovered shocking incriminations of corruption.
26. The investigation was stalled due to conflicting incriminations from eyewitnesses.
27. The defendant's defense team relied heavily on discrediting the incriminations against their client.
28. The defendant's conviction was based solely on circumstantial incriminations.
29. The plaintiff's lawsuit was dismissed due to lack of substantial incriminations.
30. The accuser recanted their incriminations, leading to the release of the wrongfully accused.