Irreligion example sentences

"Irreligion" Example Sentences

The founder preached against irreligion and advocated a return to traditional values.
Some blamed the rise in crime and social decay on the spread of irreligion.
They campaigned against what they saw as the dangers of irreligion and secular humanism.
The sermon focused on the evils of irreligion and the need for faith in society.
Critics accused the government of favoring religion over irreligion.
The Enlightenment era was characterized by a growing spirit of rationalism and irreligion.
He was an advocate for the separation of church and state and freedom from religion as well as irreligion.
The rise of atheism and agnosticism has sparked debate about the consequences of irreligion in society.
They supported religious tolerance for all faiths as well as irreligion.
Some worry that irreligion may weaken societal ethics and morality.
The policy of state-enforced secularism was meant to ensure equal treatment of all religions and irreligion.
Religious conservatives often express concern about the spread of irreligion among the youth.
History shows that irreligion has coexisted with moral progress and social harmony.
Religious institutions have long campaigned against what they see as the perils of irreligion.
Religious and nonreligious people alike should strive for mutual understanding and respect rather than demonize irreligion.
Though religious themselves, they defended the rights of those who practice irreligion.
Many atheists argue that irreligion does not necessarily lead to amorality or social decay.
Irreligion, like religion, is a matter of personal conscience that deserves tolerance and freedom from discrimination.
There are intrinsic as well as extrinsic motivations for ethical behavior for both the religious and irreligious.
Rather than fearing irreligion, religions should focus on building a just, compassionate and peaceful society for all.
Humanism provides an alternative basis for ethics, community and meaning that does not require religious faith or the absence of irreligion.
Some of history's greatest moral heroes were neither religious nor irreligious but motivated by a desire for justice.
Strict separation of religion and government equally serves both the religious and irreligious citizens of a pluralistic society.
A balanced debate about religion and irreligion should be based on facts, reason and mutual tolerance.
Reasonable people of faith and irreligion can find common ground in seeking truth, promoting human dignity and creating a more humane world.
They advocated for intellectual freedom, religious tolerance and separation of church and state to ensure equal rights for both the religious and irreligious.
While irreligion may threaten traditional religious authorities, it need not threaten a just and compassionate society.
Rather than try to stifle irreligion, religions should focus on reforming those doctrines and practices that drive people away from faith.
Human flourishing requires more than just religion or irreligion; it requires rediscovering our shared humanity.
Promoting respect, understanding and cooperation between the religious and irreligious is key to advancing peace, progress and the common good in society.
Neither religion nor irreligion has a monopoly on wisdom or virtue; both have the potential for good as well as harm.
A tolerant and pluralistic society empowers individuals to freely pursue truth according to the dictates of their own conscience - whether religious or irreligious.
Religious discrimination against the irreligious is as unjust and immoral as discrimination against people of faith.
Reason, science and humanism have the power to inspire moral progress independently of religion but also in tandem with religious ethics.
Prosperous and free societies have historically included both religious and irreligious citizens who both contribute to the common good.
Peaceful coexistence between the religious and irreligious requires mutual recognition of common humanity and shared moral values.
Irreligion is a matter of individual conscience that deserves the same rights, freedoms and protections afforded to religious conscience.
Rather than view irreligion as a threat, religious institutions would do better to reflect on why so many are losing faith.
Humanity's moral and spiritual progress depends not just on religion or irreligion alone but on honoring the shared dignity of all people.
Allyship between religious and secular/irreligious people is crucial to achieve social justice for the most vulnerable in society.
Irreligion in the right hands is no more a danger to society than religion in the wrong hands.
Through open and respectful dialogue, religious and secular/irreligious individuals can discover common purposes that advance the common good.
The test of any religion is not whether it can withstand irreligion but whether it can contribute to a more just and compassion society.
Religions and ideologies of irreligion both have the potential to inspire ethical action and social progress.
Instead of fearing or vilifying each other, the religious and irreligious must learn to see each other as partners in building a better world.
Religions that evolve to accommodate both spiritual and secular views will prove more resilient in an age of growing irreligion.
Human progress ultimately depends not on religion alone, nor irreligion alone, but on humanity's shared moral imagination.
The religious and irreligious alike must come together to defend human rights, fight injustice and build cultures of peace.
Religious freedom means respecting conscience regardless of whether it leads one to religious faith or irreligion.
Religions that embrace ethical evolution and social reform will prove better able to bridge religious and secular divides.

Common Phrases

The spread of irreligion worries many religious leaders.
The founding fathers supported religious freedom and opposed government imposition of religion, but that does not mean they condoned irreligion.
Irreligion and rampant secularism threatens the moral foundation of our society.
His speech criticized the rise of irreligion and moral decay in modern times.
They saw irreligion as a threat to social stability.
The political right often decries the growing irreligion among young people.
Irreligion goes against traditional values of faith and spirituality.
Religious leaders warn that irreligion leads to a lack of ethics and morality.
Growing numbers of people embracing irreligion especially frightens more fundamentalist religious groups.
She condemned the rise of irreligion fueled by social media and internet atheism.
Irreligion can lead to a loss of purpose and meaning, he argued.
Neither religion nor irreligion is inherently good or bad; it depends on how people practice it.
His new book examines the history and causes of irreligion in the West.
Irreligion is on the rise in traditionally religious countries, alarming many believers.
They argue that religion provides social benefits that irreligion lacks.
Atheism and agnosticism represent forms of irreligion.
Irreligion contributes to social disengagement and political polarization, critics claim.
Irreligion among youth poses dangers but also opportunities, the report found.
He accused secular leaders of fostering irreligion and weakening traditional values.
Irreligion has been increasing due to factors like science, education and urbanization.
Irreligion threatens the religious makeup of our country, some preachers warned.
The survey found higher levels of irreligion among younger and more educated groups.
Irreligion should be met with persuasion, not compulsion or censorship, he argued.
Despite warnings about irreligion, society continues to function with increasing secularization.
According to some research, irreligious societies tend to have lower crime rates.
Irreligion is nothing to fear but something to understand, the speaker argued.
Tolerance and dialogue are the best responses to the challenge of irreligion, religious leaders advised.
Her view is that irreligion reflects a spiritual longing that religion has failed to meet.
Critics claim irreligion has led to a growth in nihilism and lack of shared values.
However, it is important to distinguish between irreligion itself and hostile atheism.
The rise of irreligion does not mean the end of ethics or concern for others.
Irreligion must be countered through reasoned arguments, not censorship or coercion.
Irreligion threatens the religious makeup of Western countries, some warn.
Irreligion is not the same as immorality or lack of values.
Irreligion often brings increased individualism and weakened social ties, critics argue.
Across the West, secularization and irreligion are on the rise among younger generations.
Irreligion is a personal choice that must be met with tolerance, not condemnation.
The research found that people with high levels of irreligion tend to be more open-minded.
Irreligion does not necessary lead to unethical behavior or moral decline, studies show.
Irreligion is increasing but so is religious diversity, the report found.
Reasoned debate, not hostility or censorship, should be the response to growing irreligion.
Irreligion has been increasing due to factors like science, education, and urbanization.
Irreligion is a complex phenomenon with both positive and negative impacts.
Irreligion is about absence of religion, not presence of hostility toward religion.
Most irreligious people are ethical and moral, contrary to some religious claims.
Both irreligion and religion can be sources of good or ill for society.
Irreligion may pose social challenges, but so does excessive religiosity.
Irreligious and religious people have more in common than what divides them.
Irreligion can be countered through attraction, not through coercion or compulsion.
Irreligion is a matter of personal conscience, not a threat to society.
Most irreligious people are not "militant" but simply live and let live.
Irreligion does not automatically result in decadence or moral decline.
Irreligion is perfectly compatible with ethics, compassion, and community involvement.
Irreligion should be met with curiosity, not judgment or hostility.
Greater irreligion does not imply loss of spirituality, just differently expressed.
Irreligion requires more dialogue and understanding, less condemnation.
Irreligion is part of modern pluralism and must be accepted.
Irreligious and religious people can find common moral ground through dialogue.
Irreligion itself is neither virtuous nor vicious; that depends on people's choices.
Irreligion is here to stay; the challenge is how we live together peacefully.