"Justices" Example Sentences
1. The justices were divided in their decision.
2. The appointment of justices is a highly political process.
3. Many people look to the Supreme Court justices as leaders of the justice system.
4. The justices delivered a landmark ruling in the case.
5. The justices carefully consider each case before making a ruling.
6. The justices' opinions were published in the official record.
7. The justices were praised for their impartiality.
8. The justices held a closed-door meeting to discuss the case.
9. The justices' decision was met with both praise and criticism.
10. The justices' dissenting opinions were also published.
11. The justices' interpretation of the law was controversial.
12. The justices' opinions were based on precedents set in previous cases.
13. The justices questioned the validity of the evidence presented in court.
14. The justices' decision had far-reaching consequences.
15. The justices' rulings have helped to shape American jurisprudence.
16. The justices' deliberations were lengthy and detailed.
17. The justices' decision was met with protests outside the courthouse.
18. The justices' written opinions were required reading for law students.
19. The justices were appointed for life by the President.
20. The justices' questioning of the attorneys was rigorous.
21. The justices were sworn in at a formal ceremony.
22. The justices' decision was seen as a victory for civil rights.
23. The justices' dissenting opinions represented a minority view.
24. The justices' interpretation of the Constitution was widely debated.
25. The justices' unanimous decision was a surprise to many.
26. The justices' decision was based on legal precedent, not personal beliefs.
27. The justices' rulings have had a significant impact on American society.
28. The justices' decisions are often scrutinized by legal scholars.
29. The justices' decision in this case could set a new legal standard.
30. The justices' ruling was final and binding.
Common Phases
- The
justices agreed with the majority opinion; however, they wrote a dissenting opinion.
- The
justices analyzed the evidence presented during the trial; consequently, they reached their verdict.
- The
justices reviewed the case before them; similarly, they evaluated the precedent set by previous cases.
- The
justices considered the legal arguments made by both sides; furthermore, they weighed the potential consequences of their decision.
- The
justices based their ruling on the Constitution; nevertheless, they recognized the complexity of the issue at hand.
- The
justices heard the arguments of the parties involved; subsequently, they asked questions to clarify certain points.