Libel example sentences

"Libel" Example Sentences

1. The accusation in the magazine article was libelous.
2. The newspaper was sued for libel after publishing damaging and untrue claims about the politician.
3. The author was taken to court for libel over the false allegations in his book.
4. The celebrity filed a libel suit against the tabloid that printed lies about her personal life.
5. The company threatened legal action over the libelous online reviews.
6. The blog post contained libelous statements that were potentially defamatory.
7. The defendant claimed the libelous comments were just an innocent mistake.
8. The writer must be very careful not to publish any libelous statements in his column.
9. The newspaper issued an apology for publishing the libelous article.
10. The organization was fined for spreading libelous rumors about a candidate during the election campaign.
11. The plaintiff in the libel suit was seeking damages for harm to her reputation.
12. The author's false statements were found to constitute libel by the jury.
13. The untrue claims made in bad faith constituted libel per se.
14. Social media posts can just as easily spread libel as traditional media outlets.
15. The employee was fired for posting libelous comments about his coworkers online.
16. The libel suit was settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
17. Libel laws protect individuals from false claims that damage their reputations.
18. The police report proved the libelous accusation was utterly baseless.
19. The boss threatened to sue his employee over the libelous performance review.
20. The blogger posted a retraction and apology for the libelous post.
21. Truth is an absolute defense against libel claims.
22. The celebrity dropped his libel suit after evidence showed the report was substantially true.
23. Libel is publishing a false written statement that harms someone's reputation.
24. The student was expelled for publishing libelous flyers about a teacher.
25. The politician's libel suit was dismissed for lack of evidence.
26. The journalist commented that apologizing for a published libel was standard practice.
27. Libel plaintiffs must prove that the defendant knew the statement was false.
28. Legal experts advised the magazine not to publish the potentially libelous article.
29. The newspaper won the libel case as it showed the story was responsibly researched.
30. The libelous blog post damaged the company's reputation and cost them clients.
31. The victim of the libelous rumor campaign took legal action to protect her good name.
32. The court ruled that the libelous claims were clearly meant to outrage and offend.
33. The article contained such libelous inaccuracies that a retraction was issued.
34. Careless or malicious libel can destroy careers and ruin lives.
35. The allegedly libelous statements were made recklessly without due care for the truth.
36. The witness testimony refuted the central claim in the libelous newspaper story.
37. Libelous remarks can be made through any medium of communication.
38. The newspaper's lawyers argued the story was fair comment, not libel.
39. The victim of online libel has to prove the comments were published, not just posted.
40. The libelous allegations damaged the company's profits and stock value.
41. The author argued he did not intend libel in his satirical work.
42. The celebrity won a substantial damages award in the libel lawsuit.
43. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding the defendant guilty of libel.
44. The student's expulsion for libelous graffiti was deemed excessive by the judge.
45. The newspaper editor argued they had not acted with malice needed to prove libel.
46. Accidental libel is not enough to justify damages in most jurisdictions.
47. The defendant unsuccessfully tried to argue the comments were fair comment, not libel.
48. The blogger could not prove the truth of his potentially libelous claims.
49. Anyone who publishes or spreads libelous material may be legally liable.
50. The politician used the libel suit to publicly make his case and gain sympathy.
51. The journalist refused to reveal her source for the potentially libelous information.
52. Truth is an absolute defense in any libel suit involving matters of public interest.
53. The fired employee threatened to sue for libel over damaging contents of her HR file.
54. The newspaper argued its reporting was fair and accurate, not libelous.
55. An apology and retraction for libel may reduce the damages awarded by the court.
56. Most libel suits are settled out of court with an apology and financial compensation.
57. The witness testimony proved key details of the libelous claims were entirely false.
58. Expert legal opinion was that libel had clearly been committed in the newspaper article.
59. Libel law aims to balance free speech rights with protection of an individual's reputation.
60. The victim of the libelous rumor considered taking legal action but dropped the matter.

Common Phases

1. The author was sued for libel after publishing false claims about the businessman.
2. The article contained many libelous statements that were untrue and defamatory toward the politician.
3. She filed a libel suit against the newspaper for publishing lies about her personal life.
4. His lawyer advised him to sue the blogger for libel due to the false accusations made online.
5. The reporters were careful to avoid making any libelous claims in their write-up.
6. The defamatory comments were judged as libel by the court.
7. The newspaper issued a retraction and apology for the libelous article.
8. The celebrity won the libel case against the tabloid.
9. The judge ruled that the defendant was guilty of libel and ordered them to pay damages.
10. He was accused of libel after tweeting unfounded allegations against an opponent.
11. The athlete's lawyer threatened to sue the magazine for libel over the damaging story.
12. She settled out of court to avoid a costly and humiliating libel suit.
13. His reputation was damaged by the libelous post which impugned his honesty and integrity.
14. The libelous tweet spread like wildfire and caused irreparable harm.
15. The court ruled that the incident was not libelous as the account was truthful.
16. The libelous statement imputed dishonesty on the part of the victim.
17. The defense argued that the allegedly libelous claim was a matter of opinion, not fact.
18. The writer was careful to avoid making any libelous assertions in his work of nonfiction.
19. The plaintiff failed to prove that the statement was defamatory or libelous.
20. The victim's lawyers cited numerous libelous comments made in the blog post.
21. The court determined that the article's claims were not provably false and therefore not libelous.
22. The lawsuit sought damages for libel and slander against the defendants.
23. The social media posts contained many libelous allegations against their credibility and character.
24. Libelous remarks were made against a public figure during the heated debate.
25. The victim's reputation and career prospects were damaged by the libelous campaign.
26. The libelous story went viral and resulted in financial losses for the company.
27. The evidence does not support the allegation of libel made against the newspaper.
28. Truth is an absolute defense against charges of libel.
29. The libelous claims spread quickly but were retracted just as rapidly.
30. The internet has made it easier for libelous comments to be propagated and circulated.
31. The judge awarded damages after ruling that the defendant was guilty of libel.
32. The celebrity had to apologize for tweeting libelous comments against his critics.
33. The defendant's admission that the claims were false weakens the denial of libel.
34. The victim demanded a public apology for the libelous reporting.
35. The journalist published the story without verifying its truthfulness and faced accusations of libel.
36. The accusing party needs to prove that the allegedly libelous claims were false as well as malicious.
37. The blogger retracted the libelous post and apologized to avoid legal action.
38. The libelous post imputed criminal behavior on the victim's part.
39. The witnesses' testimony proved that the allegedly libelous claims were, in fact, true.
40. The social media post accused another user of libel for spreading false rumors.
41. The police demanded that the newspapers retract their libelous statements about the investigation.
42. The blogger was charged with libel after publishing false information with malicious intent.
43. Many celebrities issue libel lawsuits whenever reporters publish false claims about them.
44. The false accusations were clearly designed to damage the victim's reputation and amounted to libel.
45. The dictionary defines libel as a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation.
46. The victim's lawyer warned of potential libel charges if the newspaper did not retract the false claims.
47. Many consider libel laws to be an important check against the spread of harmful misinformation.
48. The court case centered around determining whether the disputed claims were libelous or protected opinion.
49. The plaintiff sought an injunction to prevent further libelous publications by the defendant.
50. The newspaper was ordered to print an apology and pay damages for the libelous report.
51. Many news organizations have strict policies against publishing any claims that could constitute libel.
52. Proving libel usually requires evidence that the defendant either knew or should have known the claims were false.
53. The jury was instructed that a claim can only constitute libel if made with negligence or actual malice.
54. The statement alleged that the libelous claims were designed to harm the victim's political opponents.
55. Truthful claims that are made in the public interest are not generally considered libelous.
56. The defendant argued that the report simply expressed an honest opinion rather than a libelous statement of fact.
57. Libelous claims against famous people are common tactics used by tabloids to boost circulation.
58. Public figures face a higher burden of proof in libel cases due to First Amendment protections.
59. The defendant claimed that the publication was made without actual malice and therefore could not legally constitute libel.
60. Legal experts argue that the shifting landscape of social media has made enforcing libel laws quite challenging.