Piecemealing example sentences

Related (6): assembly, patchwork, incremental, disjointed, partial, fragmentary

"Piecemealing" Example Sentences

Critics argued that the project was illegally piecemealing to avoid environmental review.
The developer was accused of piecemealing the expansive development into smaller projects.
The environmental impact report failed to adequately address the effects of piecemealing.
Approving the project through illegal piecemealing would have disastrous consequences.
Opponents claimed the government was improperly piecemealing the large-scale project.
Piecemealing the expansive construction into separate projects would undermine the planning process.
Critics argued that piecemealing the development into parts less than 50 acres circumvented environmental laws.
Opponents accused the developer of illegally piecemealing the over 1,000 acre project into separate parts.
Approving the project based on piecemealed environmental analyses would set a poor precedent.
Piecemealing the development into separate projects of less than 25 units skirted the review process.
The planning commission rejected the environmental impact report for improper piecemealing.
Critics argued that piecemealing the expansive project interfered with comprehensive planning.
Regulators refused to approve piecemealing of the vast construction project.
Opponents accused the government agency of piecemealing a massive public works project to understate impacts.
The public called for a full environmental review rather than illegal piecemealing.
Developers argued that legally piecemealing large projects could streamline permitting.
Regulators rejected piecemealed environmental analysis for the multi-phase construction proposal.
Critics accused the government of unlawfully piecemealing the expansive redevelopment plan.
Opponents claimed approving piecemealed analysis would mean shirking responsibility for the full impact.
Piecemealing prevented the full scope and consequences of the massive project from being analyzed.
Critics argued that if piecemealing was allowed, it would be impossible to fully mitigate impacts.
The court ruled that piecemealing the analysis for stages of the project violated environmental laws.
Opponents argued the piecemealed parts of the project could not function independently.
Approving piecemealed phases of the massive project undermined regional planning goals.
Critics charged that the piecemealed project would have cumulatively significant impacts.
Regulators warned that approving piecemealed projects could result in significant environmental harm.
Opponents criticized the piecemealing as a blatant attempt to evade environmental review.
Developers claimed they were legally piecemealing the large project into manageable stages.
The government agency denied piecemealing the multi-phase construction in order to limit analysis.
Regulators refused to approve piecemealed environmental impact reports for the massive development.
Critics argued that the piecemealed parts were dependent on each other and the overall project.
Approving piecemealed environmental reports for the sprawling construction would be unlawful.
Piecemealing allowed the developer to understate the project's total impacts and circumvent scrutiny.
Opponents accused the city of improperly piecemealing the large construction into smaller projects.
Regulators rejected piecemealing the environmental review for the multi-phase redevelopment.
Critics argued that individually, the piecemealed projects made little sense and served no purpose.
Opponents claimed the piecemealed parts of the project could not function independently from each other.
The court ruled against the government agency for improperly piecemealing the massive undertaking.
Regulators refused to approve piecemealed environmental impact reports for separate stages of construction.
Approving piecemealed analysis for stages of the project would set a dangerous legal precedent.
Critics argued that piecemealing allowed the full scope and magnitude of impacts to be concealed.
Opponents accused the developer of illegally segmenting the large undertaking into piecemealed parts.
Regulators demanded a comprehensive environmental review, rather than piecemealed analyses.
Piecemealing allowed the massive undertaking to evade comprehensive planning and environmental review.
The court ruled against piecemealing separate stages of the project in order to limit environmental analysis.
Critics charged that piecemealing the project prevented the full range of alternatives from being considered.
Opponents accused the government agency of illegally splitting the large-scale project into piecemealed parts.
Regulators warned that piecemealed environmental reviews would likely underestimate cumulative impacts.
Piecemealing the project deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to participate in a full review.
Approving piecemealed analyses for the massive redevelopment would constitute malfeasance.