Reviewer example sentences

"Reviewer" Example Sentences

1. The reviewer criticized the book's lack of character development.
2. The film reviewer loved the movie's intricate plot and witty humor.
3. The job reviewer approved our new hire after a thorough background check.
4. The manuscript reviewer provided helpful feedback on grammatical errors.
5. The product reviewer panned the company's lazy design choices.
6. The event reviewer loved the engaging entertainment but panned the overly long speeches.
7. The travel reviewer highlighted the scenic beauty but warned of high costs.
8. The technology reviewer cautioned that the software required a complex learning curve.
9. The news reviewer flagged inaccurate facts in the reporter's story.
10. The application reviewer disapproved our proposal due to missing information.
11. The research reviewer recommended that the study expand to include a larger sample size.
12. The restaurant reviewer recommended the seasonal specials but criticized the dated decor.
13. The peer reviewer flagged issues related to the study's methodology and data analysis.
14. The experiment reviewer suggested additional control conditions and alternative hypotheses.
15. The expert reviewer warned of risks associated with the proposed approach.
16. The policy reviewer advocated for giving beneficiaries more autonomy.
17. The software reviewer exposed security vulnerabilities and broken functionality.
18. The expert reviewer critiqued the paper's narrow focus and omitted nuance.
19. The textbook reviewer praised the book's clear writing style and helpful visuals.
20. The study reviewer called for acknowledging limitations related to sampling and measurement.
Continuing...
51. The grant reviewer recommended funding for expanding the project's scope.
52. The design reviewer flagged issues with poor usability and limited accessibility.
53. The customer reviewer complained of the product's short lifespan and poor durability.
54. The architectural reviewer praised the building's sleek aesthetic but criticized its poor acoustics.
55. The data reviewer flagged outliers and missing values that skewed the results.
56. The proposal reviewer requested clarification on various assumptions and methodologies.
57. The referee reviewer overturned the referee's controversial call after watching the replay.
58. The test reviewer flagged numerous typos and ambiguities in the exam questions.
59. The performance reviewer praised the actor's emotional range but criticized lack of nuance.
60. The experiment reviewer called for including controls to rule out confounding variables.

Common Phases

1. The movie reviewer gave it a poor rating.
2. The art reviewer praised the new exhibition.
3. The product reviewer found several issues with the design.
4. The book reviewer recommended not wasting time reading it.
5. The external reviewer provided valuable feedback on the report.
6. The FDA reviewer analyzed the submitted data.
7. The peer reviewer provided constructive criticism to improve the paper.
8. The grant reviewer recommended rejecting the proposal.
9. The land use proposal was referred to the county reviewer.
10. The employment application was forwarded to the HR reviewer.
11. The reviewer found typos on many of the pages.
12. The job applicant waited anxiously for feedback from the hiring manager reviewer.
13. The paper was sent out for blind review to avoid reviewer bias.
14. The reviewer highlighted important sections for revision.
15. The tenure committee reviewed the candidate's full application file.
16. The reviewer examined the website's usability issues.
17. The project reviewer recommended some changes to the timeline.
18. After going through several rounds of revisions, the reviewer finally approved the manuscript.
19. The policy reviewer scrutinized the proposal for legal issues.
20. The examiner acted as a reviewer for the certification process.
21. The code reviewer quickly found several bugs.
22. The manuscript undergoes review by external reviewers before acceptance for publication.
23. The editor assigned four reviewers to evaluate the research paper.
24. The site reviewer found evidence of soil contamination.
25. The editorial reviewer copyedited the text for clarity and conciseness.
26. The peer reviewers provided detailed feedback on the first draft.
27. I waited nervously for the reviewer's response to my cover letter and resume.
28. The journal editors thanked the reviewers for their thorough and thoughtful reviews.
29. Survey responses are submitted anonymously to avoid biasing the reviewer.
30. The professional reviewer's insightful comments helped improve my writing.
31. The guest reviewer provided comments during the design review meeting.
32. The site reviewer conducted interviews with stakeholders as part of the evaluation.
33. The research proposal underwent a rigorous review by expert panel reviewers.
34. The reviewer took issue with several points made in the supporting documentation.
35. The architectural reviewer critiqued the building design.
36. The inspector acted as a reviewer to ensure regulatory compliance.
37. The planning committee reviewer identified areas that needed additional study.
38. The copy reviewer edited the manuscript for grammar, punctuation and style.
39. The program reviewer evaluated the project plan for feasibility.
40. The recipe reviewer suggested using different spices for an even tastier version.
41. The insurance reviewer evaluated the claim for coverage.
42. The quality reviewer examined the product for defects.
43. The movie reviewer panned the film for its poor acting and script.
44. The essay reviewer suggested reorganizing some sections for clarity.
45. The journalist acted as a media reviewer for the event.
46. The manuscript underwent triple-blind peer review by independent experts.
47. The technology reviewer evaluated the latest smartphones.
48. The wine reviewer described the wine's aroma, color, flavor and aftertaste.
49. The auditor acted as a reviewer to ensure compliance with company policies.
50. The field reviewer conducted site visits and interviews as part of the evaluation.
51. The statistical reviewer analyzed the data analysis and results.
52. The historian acted as a reviewer for the history textbook.
53. The principal reviewed the teacher performance evaluations.
54. The eye doctor reviewed the patient's visual acuity test results.
55. The lab reviewer examined the test samples under a microscope.
56. The building code reviewer evaluated the blueprints for compliance.
57. The IRB reviewer evaluated the research study proposal.
58. The judicial reviewer evaluated the appeal for merit.
59. The Reddit reviewer commented on the post.
60. The customer reviewer criticized the bad customer service experience.