Supersedeas example sentences

"Supersedeas" Example Sentences

1. The defendant filed a petition for supersedeas to stay the enforcement of the judgment.
2. The court granted the plaintiff's motion for supersedeas pending appeal.
3. The appellate court issued a writ of supersedeas to halt the lower court's order.
4. The judge ordered the issuance of a supersedeas bond to secure the stay of execution.
5. The defendant posted a supersedeas bond to obtain a stay of the collection of damages.
6. The plaintiff sought a writ of supersedeas from the Supreme Court to protect its rights.
7. The appellate court denied the defendant's request for supersedeas, citing lack of urgency.
8. The petitioner argued that the writ of supersedeas was necessary to prevent irreparable harm.
9. The defendant's counsel filed a motion to dissolve the supersedeas on grounds of futility.
10. The judge set the amount of the supersedeas bond at $500,000 to ensure adequate protection for the plaintiff.
11. The plaintiff moved for the forfeiture of the supersedeas bond due to the defendant's failure to comply with the order.
12. The appellate court held that the issuance of the writ of supersedeas was not a matter of right, but of discretion.
13. The defendant sought to extend the period of the supersedeas pending appeal by filing a motion for rehearing.
14. The plaintiff challenged the sufficiency of the supersedeas bond, claiming that it did not cover the full amount of the judgment.
15. The court issued a rule to show cause why the supersedeas bond should not be forfeited for violation of the terms of the stay.
16. The petitioner filed a petition for a writ of supersedeas, requesting an immediate temporary stay of the order.
17. The defendant argued that the supersedeas bond requirement violated its constitutional right to due process.
18. The judge concluded that the issuance of the supersedeas would not substantially harm the plaintiff's interests.
19. The court found that the defendant failed to meet the conditions for the issuance of a supersedeas bond.
20. The plaintiff moved to dismiss the defendant's request for supersedeas based on the lack of merit of its appeal.
21. The defendant's counsel submitted an affidavit in support of the supersedeas petition, citing the financial hardship that the stay would cause.
22. The appellate court reversed the trial court's order granting the supersedeas, finding that the defendant failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
23. The plaintiff objected to the defendant's proposed supersedeas bond, arguing that it did not meet the statutory requirements.
24. The judge ordered the defendant to file a new supersedeas bond within five days to comply with the court's rules.
25. The defendant applied for an emergency supersedeas, citing the urgency of the matter and the irreparable harm that would result from the order.
26. The court denied the petitioner's request for supersedeas, stating that it did not raise a substantial question on appeal.
27. The appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to reconsider the grant of the supersedeas in light of new evidence.
28. The defendant failed to post the supersedeas bond as required, resulting in the immediate enforcement of the judgment.
29. The plaintiff moved to strike the defendant's supersedeas petition as untimely and procedurally defective.
30. The judge granted the plaintiff's motion to dissolve the supersedeas on the ground of the defendant's breach of the conditions of the stay.

Common Phrases

1. The judge issued a supersedeas order; the appellant can now delay the enforcement of the judgment.
2. The court granted a supersedeas bond; the defendant can now stay the execution of the judgment pending appeal.
3. The plaintiff filed a motion to dissolve the supersedeas; the defendant needs to show cause why the stay should continue.
4. The court entered a supersedeas stay; the appellants can continue operating their business despite the adverse ruling.
5. The court denied the defendant's motion for supersedeas; the plaintiff can proceed with the execution of the judgment without delay.