Sweatshop example sentences
"Sweatshop" Example Sentences
Common Phrases
- The clothing was manufactured in a horrible sweatshop with harsh working conditions.
- Workers at the sweatshop made the clothes for long hours and little pay.
- Labor groups criticized the company for using sweatshops to make their products.
- Activists called for a boycott of the clothing line until they stopped using sweatshops.
- The documentary exposed the terrible conditions inside the sweatshops where the sneakers were made.
- Reporters investigated reports of child labor in the overseas sweatshops.
- Consumers demanded that companies reveal whether they used sweatshops in their supply chain.
- Companies faced pressure to ensure fair wages and working conditions in the overseas factories and sweatshops that made their products.
- Sweatshops are known for exploiting vulnerable workers, especially immigrants and children.
- Employees of the sweatshop had to work long hours under harsh conditions for very little pay.
- Politicians promised to crack down on sweatshops that broke labor laws.
- Consumers vowed to only buy from companies that revealed their supply chains and working conditions in factories and sweatshops.
- People protested outside the brand's stores against their use of offshore sweatshops.
- The brand claimed they did not directly operate any sweatshops but admitted some of their suppliers may still have issues to address.
- Critics argue that even brands that claim to avoid sweatshops benefit from the low labor costs set by the broader market of sweatshop labor.
- Some economists argue that sweatshops play an important role in industrializing developing countries by providing the first rung on the economic ladder.
- Others counter that sweatshops exploit workers and allow companies to externalize costs while reaping large profits.
- Some brands have tried to address sweatshop conditions through voluntary codes of conduct and factory inspections of their suppliers.
- However, enforcement of such voluntary codes and inspection reports from brands have been criticized as inadequate and ineffective at fully eliminating sweatshop conditions.
- Activists pushed for strong government regulation and enforcement of labor laws and inspections as the most effective way to permanently improve conditions in sweatshops.
- The exposé into the apparel industry revealed a vast network of sweatshops producing garments under questionable labor practices.
- Reformers argued that sweatshops violated basic human rights and dignity despite the economic benefits they may provide to some workers.
- Workers at the sweatshop toiled long hours under terrible conditions for meager wages.
- Residents of the poor neighborhood where the sweatshop operated had few other job options.
- The garment industry depends on a global supply chain of offshore sweatshops to keep costs low.
- Authorities raided the illegal sweatshop and arrested the operators for wage and hour violations.
- Sweatshops are criticized for cruel and inhumane treatment of their workers.
- Some companies continue to deny that their suppliers operate sweatshops despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
- Activists called for brands to take more responsibility for working conditions in the factories and sweatshops that actually make their products.
- The news report exposed the human cost of the cheap consumer goods produced in developing country sweatshops.
- Consumers were shocked to learn that some of their favorite brands' products were made in poorly regulated sweatshops.
- Working long hours in the hot, crowded sweatshop left workers exhausted and vulnerable to heat-related illnesses.
- The brightly colored, trendy clothes seemed odd coming from the dim and dreary sweatshop described in the report.
- Some charities work to provide alternatives to sweatshop employment for vulnerable workers.
- Whistleblowers risked retaliation by exposing abuses and safety violations occuring inside the sweatshops.
- Activists argued that even well-meaning consumers were complicit in perpetuating the sweatshop system through their purchasing choices.
- The tour of the factory revealed a much more humane working environment than the stereotypical image of a sweatshop.
- Sweatshops exploit vulnerable workers and allow companies to externalize costs rather than pay living wages.
- Labor organizers fought to unionize the sweatshop workers so they could collectively bargain for better wages and conditions.
- The practice of subcontracting to unregulated sweatshops allows brands to avoid liability for poor labor practices.
- Goods produced in sweatshops are artificially cheap due to the exploitation of vulnerable immigrant workers.
- Sweatshops normalize the acceptance of poor working conditions and human rights abuses.
- The investigative report documented cases of sexual harassment, wage theft, and intimidation occurring within the sweatshop.
- The working conditions inside the sweatshop were hot, crowded, dirty, and exploitative.
- Brands that operate responsibly in their own factories still benefit from the artificially low costs set by the broader sweatshop industry.
- Workers' rights activists fought for decades to improve labor standards and regulate sweatshop conditions.
- Reports of extreme abuse in overseas sweatshops prompted a consumer boycott of the brand's products.
- Sweatshops exist because companies prioritize low costs and high profit margins over workers' basic needs and rights.
- The exposé revealed a complex global economy dependent on the exploitation of poor, marginalized laborers in sweatshops.
- Regulators cracked down on the unsafe working conditions and minimum wage violations at the large textile sweatshop.
- Workers at the brand described grueling quotas, shoddy supplies, and punitive supervisors inside their overseas sweatshop jobs.
- Activists criticized governments for failing to strengthen labor laws and enforce basic protections for sweatshop workers.
- Conditions inside the sweatshops were reputed to be dirty, unsafe, and exploitative.
- Investors pressured brands to strengthen oversight of their supply chains to eliminate sweatshop labor practices.
- The expose spurred consumer outrage and calls for brands to take responsibility for sweatshop conditions in their suppliers' factories.
- Workers described equipment failures, locked doors, and unsanitary conditions as the norm inside the sweatshop.
- Brands faced pressure to publicly commit to fair compensation, transparency and rigorous oversight of their entire supply chain and network of sweatshops.
- Critics accused the company of using cheap sweatshop labor to fuel exorbitant profit margins and executive pay.
- The repeated media exposés embarrassed brands and pressured them to address sweatshop labor issues within their supply chains.
- Sweatshops represent the worst abuses of corporate power and exploitation of the most vulnerable workers.
Recently Searched
› Rehabber
› Nipaspanish [ˈnēpə]
› Gauzy
› Martian
› Kielce
› Cussed
› Etcd
› Caulifloweret [ˈkälēˌflou(ə)r]