Appellants example sentences

"Appellants" Example Sentences

1. The appellants appealed the lower court's decision, stating that it was erroneous.
2. The appellants argued that the evidence presented in court was insufficient to convict them.
3. The appellants filed a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that their rights were violated.
4. The appellants contended that the lower court judge's ruling was biased and unfair.
5. The appellants claimed that their due process rights were violated during the trial.
6. The appellants submitted new evidence in their appeal that they argued should overturn the original verdict.
7. The appellants cited numerous legal precedents to support their case.
8. The appellants sought to have the original trial judge recused on the grounds of bias.
9. The appellants argued that the prosecution had not met the burden of proof required for conviction.
10. The appellants asserted that the jury was improperly instructed on the law.
11. The appellants maintained that they were innocent of the charges brought against them.
12. The appellants asked that the case be retried in a different jurisdiction.
13. The appellants sought to have their convictions overturned and the charges dismissed.
14. The appellants appealed to the higher court to review the lower court judgment.
15. The appellants claimed that they were denied a fair trial by the lower court.
16. The appellants argued that the prosecution's case was based on hearsay evidence.
17. The appellants contended that the sentencing imposed was excessive and unfairly harsh.
18. The appellants argued that their constitutional rights had been violated during the trial.
19. The appellants petitioned the court to reconsider their case.
20. The appellants sought a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that their imprisonment was unlawful.
21. The appellants challenged the legality of the search warrant used in their arrest.
22. The appellants sought to have the evidence obtained through the search warrant suppressed.
23. The appellants claimed that the police had coerced their confessions.
24. The appellants argued that the trial was conducted in a prejudicial manner.
25. The appellants claimed that the prosecution had engaged in misconduct during the trial.
26. The appellants contended that the lower court judge had made several errors in law during the trial.
27. The appellants sought to have their cases heard as a class action.
28. The appellants requested a stay of their sentences pending the outcome of their appeals.
29. The appellants argued that their sentences were disproportionate to the crimes committed.
30. The appellants alleged that the lower court judge had made numerous procedural errors during the trial.