Casuist example sentences
- Home
- "Casuist" example sentences
Related (6): morality, ethics, casuistry, sophistry, rationalization, justification
"Casuist" Example Sentences
- The casuist debated the ethical implications of the situation.
- A casuist can argue any side of a moral dilemma with equal conviction.
- The casuist found a loophole in the legal system.
- Many people dismissed the casuist’s arguments as sophistry.
- As a casuist, she was constantly analyzing people’s behavior for ethical dilemmas.
- The casuist was obsessed with finding a way to justify her actions.
- The casuist’s philosophy was based on moral relativism.
- The casuist’s arguments were convincing, but ultimately flawed.
- He was a born casuist, always twisting words and arguing his way out of trouble.
- The casuist was hired to find a way to comply with the law while breaking it.
- Some casuists believe that morality is subjective and varies from person to person.
- The casuist was skilled at manipulating his audience’s emotions.
- The casuist argued that the end justified the means.
- She was a master casuist, always finding a way to weasel out of responsibility.
- The casuist’s argument was based on technicalities rather than principle.
- The casuist was able to justify his actions by twisting the definitions of words.
- Many people are turned off by the casuistic nature of legal language.
- The casuist’s rhetoric was grandiose, but ultimately empty.
- The casuist tried to justify his behavior by pointing out the hypocrisy of others.
- The casuist argued that there were no black and white moral issues, only shades of gray.
- The casuist was skilled at deflecting blame and responsibility onto others.
- The casuist’s philosophy was based on the idea that humans were inherently flawed.
- The casuist’s ability to argue both sides of an issue made him invaluable in court.
- The casuist’s argument relied on hairsplitting and semantics.
- Some people accuse casuists of being immoral because they can argue any position.
- The casuist’s overly-complicated argument left his listeners feeling confused and frustrated.
- The casuist’s argument seemed logical on the surface, but fell apart under scrutiny.
- Many politicians have a casuistic way of speaking that makes it difficult to pin down their true beliefs.
- The casuist used his powers of persuasion to convince his audience to adopt his perspective.
- The casuist’s argument was clever, but ultimately shallow.
Common Phrases
- The casuist argued that the man's intentions mattered more than the outcome;
- Casuistry often involves parsing fine distinctions between different moral dilemmas;
- Many people view casuistry as a way to avoid taking a clear moral stance;
- The casuist struggled to justify the ethical implications of their decision;
- Critics of casuistry argue that it overemphasizes individual circumstances over universal principles;
- The casuist approached each situation with a careful and rigorous ethical analysis;
- In some philosophical circles, casuistry is seen as a valid approach to resolving moral uncertainty;
- The casuist's reasoning was complex and nuanced, and not easily reduced to simple categories;
- Casuistry often involves discerning the difference between what is lawful and what is truly ethical;
- The casuist's reasoning relied heavily on a detailed understanding of the particular facts and circumstances involved.
Recently Searched