Impeach example sentences

Related (5): indict, remove, accuse, censure, charge.

"Impeach" Example Sentences

The House of Representatives impeached the President.
The House Judiciary Committee voted to impeach the President for high crimes and misdemeanors.
The Senate will hold an impeachment trial to decide whether to remove the President from office.
Those in favor of impeachment argued that the President's actions warranted removal from office.
Those opposed to impeachment argued that the President's actions did not rise to the level of impeachable offenses.
Impeachment does not guarantee removal from office, as the Senate still needs to convict with a two-thirds majority vote.
Many believed the impeachment proceedings were driven more by partisan politics than constitutional violations.
The President's defenders argued that the impeachment effort was a partisan witch hunt.
Impeachment is a formal accusation of wrongdoing that does not automatically result in removal from office.
The President vowed to fight the impeachment charges and clear his name.
The allegations against the President, if proven true, may warrant impeachment.
Legal scholars were divided on whether the President's actions met the constitutional standard for impeachment.
Critics accused Congressional opponents of attempting to impeach the President for political gain.
Impeachment advocates argued that no one, not even the President, is above the law.
The impeachment inquiry is seeking to determine if the President engaged in impeachable offenses.
The President's impeachment and subsequent Senate acquittal could weaken his political capital and agenda.
Those hoping for impeachment believed it would send a message about constitutional boundaries.
Opponents of impeachment warned that it could further divide the country.
Impeachment proceedings can destroy a Presidency even if the Senate ultimately votes against removal from office.
It would take a bipartisan effort to successfully impeach and remove a sitting President.
Many thought the impeachment charges lacked sufficient evidence and credibility.
The President's defenders argued that the impeachment effort stemmed from political animosity, not legal violations.
Opponents argued that impeaching the President would set a dangerous precedent.
Proponents of impeachment maintained that no one is above the law, including the President.
Those opposed to impeachment argued that voters, not Congress, should decide the President's fate at the ballot box.
Impeachment is the first step in the removal process, requiring only a simple majority in the House.
Removal from office requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate, a high bar that is rarely met.
The impeachment investigation threatens to further undermine the President's credibility and agenda.
Critics argued that impeachment was an overt attempt to overturn the will of voters who elected the President.
Supporters of impeachment maintained that the President's alleged misconduct warranted proceedings.
Opponents claimed that impeachment efforts amounted to a political witch hunt.
Impeachment advocates maintained that Congress had a constitutional duty to investigate allegations of wrongdoing.
Impeachment, conviction and removal from office are rare and extraordinary events in American politics.
The President faced impeachment allegations but maintained that he had done nothing wrong.
The impeachment effort was largely led by the President's political opponents.
Impeachment, if successful, could tarnish the President's legacy regardless of the ultimate Senate verdict.
Supporters of impeachment argued that the President violated his oath of office and the public trust.
Detractors claimed that impeachment efforts stemmed from longstanding partisan acrimony, not constitutional concerns.
The impeachment inquiry heard testimony from both defenders and critics of the President.
The impeachment process exposed deep divisions within Congress and the country as a whole.
If the Senate convicts and removes the President, the Vice President would assume the office.
The impeachment fight bitterly divided lawmakers along partisan lines.
Impeachment remains a constitutional recourse even if the effort seems politically fraught and divisive.
The President's defenders decried the impeachment effort as an illegitimate abuse of power by political opponents.
Impeachment advocates argued that no person, including the President, was above the law.
Opponents claimed impeachment would set a dangerous precedent and overreaches constitutional authority.
The impeachment inquiry aimed to determine if the President's conduct met the constitutional standard for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Impeachment proponents believe the allegations against the President, if true, represent a grave abuse of the public trust.
Detractors argue that impeachment efforts amount to an illegitimate attempt to overturn the results of a free and fair election.
Impeachment, while legally and constitutionally warranted in some cases, can carry enormous political risk.
The impeachment inquiry did not result in any changes to the President's controversial policies.
Impeachment advocates maintained that Congress had a responsibility to investigate the allegations regardless of political consequences.
Those opposed to impeachment warned that the effort could backfire politically and become a liability in upcoming elections.
The impeachment fight further polarized an already bitterly divided Congress.
The impeachment vote was largely along party lines, failing to achieve the bipartisan consensus some argued was needed.
Impeachment advocates said the issue transcended party politics and involved upholding the Constitution.
Opponents of impeachment maintained that the allegations did not meet the high bar of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Impeachment proponents argued that the President's conduct, if proven, represented a severe abuse of public trust warranting removal.
Opponents claimed that impeachment amounted to an illegitimate attempt to reverse the results of a democratic election.
Regardless of the final Senate verdict, impeachment threatens to overshadow and undermine the President's legacy and agenda.