Leaseholders example sentences

"Leaseholders" Example Sentences

1. The leaseholders of the property are responsible for repairs and maintenance.
2. The leaseholders approved the building renovations in the owners meeting.
3. The managing agent contacted all leaseholders about the upcoming changes.
4. The leaseholders formed an association to negotiate with the freeholder.
5. The freeholder consulted with the leaseholders before raising the ground rent.
6. The leaseholders have the right to extend their lease or purchase the freehold.
7. The leaseholders want to remove restrictions regarding subletting in the lease agreement.
8. The leaseholders pay service charges to cover upkeep of common areas.
9. The leaseholders agreed to install new security cameras for the building.
10. The freeholder approved the leaseholders' petition to allow pets in the building.
11. The leaseholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of raising their service charges.
12. The leaseholders opposed the freeholder's application to demolish the building and rebuild.
13. Several leaseholders withheld their service charge payments in protest of rising costs.
14. The local council sided with the leaseholders in their dispute with the freeholder.
15. The leaseholders formed a working group to tackle issues around building maintenance.
16. The new leaseholders were informed of their responsibilities upon purchasing the flat.
17. The leaseholders committee organized social events for the residents of the development.
18. Some leaseholders felt the terms of their lease needed to be renegotiated with the freeholder.
19. The managing agent provided information to all leaseholders regarding the ongoing repairs.
20. The leaseholders demanded that the managing agent improve transparency in their finances.
21. The leaseholders club arranged a cinema event for residents in the community center.
22. The leaseholders wanted more time to review the proposed changes to their agreements.
23. Many leaseholders failed to comply with the regulations regarding balcony plantings.
24. The long-standing disputes between the freeholder and leaseholders went to mediation.
25. The increase in service charges angered many leaseholders who felt costs were unjustified.
26. The leaseholders' association negotiated a bulk discount on heating oil for the development.
27. The deterioration of common areas upset many leaseholders who felt standards were slipping.
28. Some leaseholders accused the managing agent of misappropriating funds meant for upkeep.
29. The leaseholders received an apology from the managing agent regarding delays in repairs.
30. The leaseholders debated whether to form a residents association or housing cooperative.
31. The freeholder organized a meeting with leaseholders to gather feedback on improvements.
32. The leaseholders hired a lawyer to review their agreements for any exploitative clauses.
33. Many leaseholders opposed plans by the freeholder to sell the property to a developer.
34. Some leaseholders lobbied the housing minister to intervene in the ongoing disputes.
35. The solicitor representing the leaseholders argued their case forcefully in the tribunal.
36. The tribunal ruled that the increase in service charges imposed on leaseholders be reduced.
37. The leaseholders formed a fighting fund to cover legal costs in their battle with the freeholder.
38. Several leaseholders boasted about raising their children in the thriving community.
39. The freeholder threatened the leaseholders with eviction if service charges went unpaid.
40. The leaseholders threatened to take the freeholder to court over poorly handled repairs.
41. The lawyer representing the leaseholders presented a strong case against the freeholder.
42. The disruptive actions of some leaseholders threatened to undermine the goodwill of residents.
43. The managing agent attended leaseholder meetings to explain the rationale behind rising costs.
44. Some leaseholders accused others of vandalizing communal areas but no culprits were found.
45. The new leaseholders were welcomed warmly by longstanding residents of the development.
46. The journalist wrote an exposé criticizing the freeholder's treatment of local leaseholders.
47. Many leaseholders felt let down by the managing agent after years of poorly handled issues.
48. The leaseholders passed a vote of no confidence in the managing agent at the AGM.
49. The freeholder apologised profusely to leaseholders over rising costs beyond their control.
50. The leaseholders referred contentious issues to independent arbitrators for resolution.
51. Several leaseholders expressed interest in banding together to purchase the freehold.
52. The aggressive leaseholders threatened legal action against the freeholder over unpaid bills.
53. The outgoing managing agent tried to placate angry leaseholders at the final residents meeting.
54. Many leaseholders turned up to the council meeting to voice their opposition to the plan.
55. The leaseholders hired a facilities manager to take over some responsibilities from the agent.
56. The new managing agent pledged to resolve longstanding issues for frustrated leaseholders.
57. Some leaseholders appreciated living in a diverse development with people of all backgrounds.
58. The local neighborhood group provided support for leaseholders in their battle with developers.
59. The leaseholders accused the freeholder of raising service charges to unreasonable levels.
60. The leaseholders finally received satisfaction after the long legal battle with the freeholder.