Wikipedia example sentences

1. Wikipedia is a free website with information about many things.
2. I use Wikipedia to find answers to my questions.

1. My friend told me to look it up on Wikipedia instead of asking him.
2. Wikipedia has pages about almost every topic you can think of.

1. I know Wikipedia isn't perfect, but it's usually a decent place to start.
2. The Wikipedia article about this historical event has been edited hundreds of times.

1. Wikipedia's reliability varies wildly depending on the topic — some articles are meticulously sourced, others are basically guesses.
2. She spent her entire evening correcting Wikipedia entries about her field of expertise, frustrated that misinformation had gone unchecked for years.

1. The democratization of knowledge that Wikipedia represents has fundamentally altered how people access and verify information, for better and worse.
2. What makes Wikipedia simultaneously powerful and problematic is that anyone can edit it — expertise and vandalism exist on the same platform.

1. Wikipedia occupies a peculiar space in contemporary culture: dismissed by academics yet consulted by millions, derided for its imperfections yet relied upon as a first port of call for understanding almost anything.
2. The tension between Wikipedia's egalitarian ideals and the reality of its editorial gatekeeping reveals something uncomfortable about how knowledge itself is constructed and contested.

🏠 Everyday Life

1. I was arguing with my roommate about whether penguins live in Antarctica, so we just looked it up on Wikipedia to settle it.
2. My kid asked me what a platypus is and instead of explaining, I pulled up Wikipedia and we went down a rabbit hole for an hour.

💼 Workplace

1. Someone brought up a statistic in the meeting and I quietly checked Wikipedia on my phone to see if it was actually true.
2. My coworker spent half the afternoon editing Wikipedia articles about our industry — apparently it's his weird hobby.

📊 Business

1. The Wikipedia page for our company had outdated information about our founders, so we submitted a correction request.
2. Our marketing team noticed the Wikipedia article about our competitor was getting a lot of traffic, so we analyzed what made it rank so high.

🛒 Buying / Shopping

1. I was trying to decide between two camera brands, so I read the Wikipedia comparison and then looked at actual reviews.
2. Wikipedia told me this brand was discontinued, but the store still had it in stock, so I bought it anyway.

✈️ Travel

1. Before visiting that country, I read the Wikipedia article about its history and culture so I wouldn't look completely ignorant.
2. The tour guide was telling us facts that contradicted what I'd read on Wikipedia, and I wasn't sure who to believe.

📚 Education

1. The teacher explicitly said we could use Wikipedia to understand the topic, but we had to cite actual academic sources in our paper.
2. My student asked if Wikipedia was a reliable source and I explained that it depends entirely on the article and whether the claims are properly sourced.

❤️ Relationships

1. He was telling me about his ex and I found myself looking her up on Wikipedia later — which felt weird and invasive.
2. We were having a stupid argument about movie trivia and she pulled up Wikipedia to prove I was wrong, which somehow made it worse.

📰 News / Politics

1. The Wikipedia article about that politician has been edited so many times in the last week that you can barely trust it.
2. News outlets were citing the Wikipedia page about the event, which meant the information was spreading faster than it could be verified.

💻 Technology

1. I was curious about how Wikipedia's algorithm works, so I read the Wikipedia article about Wikipedia itself.
2. The AI was trained partly on Wikipedia data, which means it inherited some of Wikipedia's biases and gaps.

📝 Formal Writing

1. While Wikipedia can serve as a useful starting point for research, it should not be cited as a primary source in academic writing.
2. The reliability of Wikipedia entries varies significantly by subject matter, with scientific and historical topics generally receiving more rigorous editorial oversight than niche or controversial subjects.